WTC Explosions Part 3
Top Comments
All Comments (441)
-
Every building is designed or not designed to fall behind the path of less resistance instead of the major one, phisics laws tell us it's a demolition, there's nothing to do.
-
where can i see full video at 3:11 ???
-
planes+bombs+wtc space.......
-
ok, when the north tower collapsed, wtc7 was only damaged on one side and fell straight down and folded like a deck of cards. ever heard of the path of least resistence moron? no? meanwhile, wtc6 was in between wtc7 and the north tower, never collapsed and had to be demolished later. here's a serious question. do you have a brain? that's my authority.
-
@seeknthetruth The North (or south, idk) Demolished the south side of WTC7. Have you ever worked in demolition, because I have, and that's not how you take down buildings. What you saw was the outer shell of the building come down, what authority do you have to make such claims anyways.
-
read this carefully: you are either a government plant or a moron. is that japanese to ya? a plane didn't hit wtc7 and it collapsed in exactly the same manner as the towers. do you remember that? no? two impacts=three steel high rise collapses. really? how's your math since you have a problem with simple english? it doesn't get any more obvious. can you earn your government check somewhere else?
-
@seeknthetruth That's because there has never been a huge fire plus the impact of a plane destroying the support beams crash into a building of that size. And fuck, your English is shit, wtf does "you're either or planted shill or a moron" mean? Where the fuck is your logic, you people think that the planes were just animations. Fuck, you people are so insipid, it makes me laugh. Where exactly did you go to college?
-
considering that fire has NEVER TOTALLY collapsed a steel high rise before or after 911, i can really see your logic here. here it is. youre either or planted shill or a moron. which is it? choose wisely?
-
@seeknthetruth I'm fully awake, and of course they could, you, on the other hand, have no idea how demolitions work. Random squibs could cause the building to fall randomly, and could also cause it to not fully fall down, leaving a fraction of the building to still be standing. You're the one who needs to wake up, stop feeding everyone your crackpot autistic theories.
fucking government
trbjr21 4 years ago 10
I'm going to explain something. The concrete floors were falling faster than the rest of the building. The "squibs" are merely evidence of air escaping that has been compressed by the falling floors. Tall buildings are designed to collapse as vertically as possible, demolition or no demolition.
Woolies2007 4 years ago 5