Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

WTC Explosions Part 3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
20,929
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 28, 2006

See the squibs or demolition explosions coming from the WTC

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 14 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • fucking government

  • I'm going to explain something. The concrete floors were falling faster than the rest of the building. The "squibs" are merely evidence of air escaping that has been compressed by the falling floors. Tall buildings are designed to collapse as vertically as possible, demolition or no demolition.

see all

All Comments (441)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Every building is designed or not designed to fall behind the path of less resistance instead of the major one, phisics laws tell us it's a demolition, there's nothing to do.

  • where can i see full video at 3:11 ???

  • planes+bombs+wtc space.......

  • @CptCool2

    ok, when the north tower collapsed, wtc7 was only damaged on one side and fell straight down and folded like a deck of cards. ever heard of the path of least resistence moron? no? meanwhile, wtc6 was in between wtc7 and the north tower, never collapsed and had to be demolished later. here's a serious question. do you have a brain? that's my authority.

  • @seeknthetruth The North (or south, idk) Demolished the south side of WTC7. Have you ever worked in demolition, because I have, and that's not how you take down buildings. What you saw was the outer shell of the building come down, what authority do you have to make such claims anyways.

  • @CptCool2

    read this carefully: you are either a government plant or a moron. is that japanese to ya? a plane didn't hit wtc7 and it collapsed in exactly the same manner as the towers. do you remember that? no? two impacts=three steel high rise collapses. really? how's your math since you have a problem with simple english? it doesn't get any more obvious. can you earn your government check somewhere else?

  • @seeknthetruth That's because there has never been a huge fire plus the impact of a plane destroying the support beams crash into a building of that size. And fuck, your English is shit, wtf does "you're either or planted shill or a moron" mean? Where the fuck is your logic, you people think that the planes were just animations. Fuck, you people are so insipid, it makes me laugh. Where exactly did you go to college?

  • @CptCool2

    considering that fire has NEVER TOTALLY collapsed a steel high rise before or after 911, i can really see your logic here. here it is. youre either or planted shill or a moron. which is it? choose wisely?

  • @seeknthetruth I'm fully awake, and of course they could, you, on the other hand, have no idea how demolitions work. Random squibs could cause the building to fall randomly, and could also cause it to not fully fall down, leaving a fraction of the building to still be standing. You're the one who needs to wake up, stop feeding everyone your crackpot autistic theories.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more