Pro Gay "marriage" Witness is Also a Commissioner

In order to cover up his fraud, Steven Golstein promoted Ann Lynne Benson as a right to life conservative republican to give some impression that the CURC is unbiased. In fact Ann Lynne Benson was involved with right to life over 3 decades ago. She is now the representative of Garden State In-equality in her legislative district and the founder of the gay, lesbian straight network in south Jersey. Promoting Homo-sex and promising to vote for Gov Corzine, she is quite a phony republican.
After testifying 2 times during the phony hearings as a witnesse, she was made a public commissioner on the CURC. Unbelievable but true in New Jersey where Corruption, Sex and Cover up coexist.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Ann Lynne Benson
• Steven Goldstein
• Gov Corzine
• Chris Christie
• Garden State Equality
• civil union commission
• James Whelan
• James Beach
• Barbara Buono
• Joseph Vitale
• Raymond Lesniak
• Nicholas Scutari
• Nicholas Sacco
• Nia Gill
• Loretta Weinberg

[Germany124]

I agree with the women.

As years pass, we are working more towards diversity. The church story is perfect. My friend got beat up in school for the same reason. Marriage is a personal belief, I believe it should be extended to all peoples, regardless of sexual orientation. I hope that one day, we stop looking at "god" for answers, and start beleiveing in human potential and diversity. And you have no right to limit marriage to that of a straight one. Defininitons have been changed before.

[theCURCconspiracy]

Marriage has evolved but it has always been between a man and a woman. That is the fundamental core and truth about marriage.

[theCURCconspiracy]

All the changes you mentioned expanded marriage between a man and a woman. They were not redefinition of marriage.

Gay activists want to destroy what they need the most. Thye are sabotaging themselves.

Gay nuptial is a counterfeit like a cubic zirconium. It will fade away and can never last eternally.

Once you pass on the other side, you will find out. It is just so sad.

Life on earth is the time to build an eternal foundation

[cockyz]

What? Ignoring your history books again! All through the 20th century, state governments and federal government defined and redefined marriage! Fortunately for hundreds of thousands of mixed-race couples, the government DID redefine marriage! Governments and courts have ruled on marriage contracts, divorce rights, child custody. The legal framework of marriage today is vastly different from what it was in 1909. Your credibility rating is in a freefall.

[theCURCconspiracy]

When did government define marriage as not being between a man and a woman ?

[cockyz]

Where in the Constitution does it say that it is owned by the people? Nowhere. The premise to your activism is founded on wresting the power from duly elected officials. The government, however, is formed by the people, for the people. I've read through your website and you appear to me to be a borderline anarchist. Nobody should trust you to defend citizens' civil rights or civic institutions. You're a public danger.

[theCURCconspiracy]

You need to reed the constitution. Even the California Supreme court understand when they dhad to accept the people vote on Prop 8

[kenballer00]

if you Go to Wikipedia and type in Baker v. Nelson, The case will show you that the same court in Loving v Virginia not only distinguished same sex marriage from interracial marriage, but established it as a right that does not exist under the constitution and never did. the california judges new it did not violate the equal protection clause but they created the right out of existence anyways.

so the 14th amendment does not confer a RIGHT to gay marriage anymore than it does for polygamy

[LegalEagleX]

CUBIC ZIRCONIUM !!?...Are you retarded?

You sound so idiotic...you really should stop.

[cockyz]

You don't know your history, do you? You need to bone up! Otherwise, you'll consider spouting your bigoted, biased, ungrounded opinions. And goodness knows there's enough stupidity being spouted in this world already. So a little less would be a welcome respite.

[cockyz]

Incomprehensible. Too many typos. But I'll tell you this, whether it's the CA constitution or the US constitution, all citizens are guaranteed full and equal treatment in all civil matters! The CA Supreme ruled that it is unconstitutional to exclude same-sex couples from the institution of marriage. The Iowa Supreme Court's ruling was the same. Beautiful prose, by the way. So, all I can say to you is you're traipsing down the wrong road. Why are you trying to hurt people? What's in it for you?

[cockyz]

It never did. No state or nation has ever passed a law eliminating marriage between male and female. What is your point?