amd bulldozer

intel's crown is in danger coz amd bulldozer is coming
used material is property of their respective owners
subscribe......

NOTE- here i forget one thing that llano is not Bulldozer based fusion.
thnx juggernautxtr to remind me that thing

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• amd
• amd bulldozer
• amd FX
• amd fusion
• AMD
• bulldozer
• vision
• die
• wafer
• cpu
• processor
• phenom
• athlon
• fusion
• zambezi
• octa
• quad
• dual
• eight
• core
• nm
• gaming
• server
• super
• oc
• overclock
• 32nm
• 28nm
• 22nm
• octacore
• fx
• black
• edition
• extreme
• ee
• intel
• pentium
• sandy
• bridge
• ivy
• computer
• flex
• duron
• video game
• consoles
• laptop
• gameplay
• ati
• nvidia
• drive
• widescreen
• Cores
• x86
• Opteron
• interlagos
• graphics
• notebook
• ram
• asus
• crysis
• geforce
• windows
• 6990
• gtx
• 590
• hd
• 7000

[Andrejino]

@ghostsofmudkips, look man...I dont have time to argue...I still have AMD Phenom(tm) 9550 Quad-Core 2.2Ghz and it's realy enough for me...all I do on my pc is making music and play games...so I dont need ultra mega fast cpu. Oh yeah one more thing....I dont give a deam for fps or speed, I dont care if someone have better fps in games then me. Have a nice day ;)

[ghostsofmudkips]

@Andrejino Well no i have a bulldozer cpu even though it works well it not a couple of seconds camparing the intel 2500k sandy bridge is half the time when rendering and can increase the fps in some games on the 2500k from 20 fps to 40 fps even though that it is still not a bad choice you really don't know much about computers.

[Andrejino]

wow...fight about cpu xD u realy people make me laugh :)

Both cpu are awesome...diference is just about couple seconds of speed...so what is some cpu is faster and another is slower...is it gona be end of the world? Every cpu is gona make same process...only diference is of couple seconds of ur lifetime. I think u all understand me ;)

[JARMOPOWER]

@dragonmastershow To be honest Bulldozer is behind it's time, it's complete fail. The bulldozer loses to the 2500k, which shouldn't be so hard to beat with a damn 8-core processor. AMD lost this generation.

[rooo1o]

@dragonmastershow Oh fine I've failed to understand them. You are completely right. I'll throw away my 2600K and get an AMD Bulldozer so all my applications will run slower and more jagged. You are perfectly logical.

[TheUnknownsock]

@dragonmastershow Your ignorance is quite amazing. There so called 8 core chip is just a 4 core chip with a slightly more superior version of Hyper Threading, obviously different tech but you get my point.

It's a known fact more cores are not better, infact there no reason to get more than 4 unless your using multi-threaded applications such as rendering.

The only reason AMD is not faster is because they failed not because they chose to.

[dragonmastershow]

@naborghsoj08 Bulldozer is ahead of it' s time with an APU, intel cpu lags like hell and very buggy. to me it 's a waste money buying their product. if you want fast cpu go intel. i also have money and i am not buying bulldozer because it is cheap but rather it has 8 core and can handle ton of aps like piece of cake at a competitive speed and that is where i put my money :-)

[rooo1o]

@dragonmastershow But even then it loses to the Intel Core i5-2500K, a processor that does what it's supposed to do without lag. Just admit that Bulldozer lost.

[rooo1o]

@dragonmastershow Dude, the results are IN, Bulldozer failed to live up to the hype and underperforms even to some cheaper AMD Phenom processors, just what the fuck are you implying? Your fanboyism is blinding you from the truth and forcing you to buy worthless and shamefully underpowered hardware. The 2nd generation Intel Core processors run more stable, energy-efficient, has miles superior processor architecture and faster L2 cache than anything Bulldozer has to offer. Bulldozer is cheaper.

[dragonmastershow]

@rooo1o you need to get your head checked!!!