PS3 vs PC vs OnLive - Ultimate Comparison (HD)
Top Comments
All Comments (1,023)
-
onlive is amazing... future has begun...!!!
-
Onlive deserves fame and I really hope it gives console games a run for their money. The thing is, I don't think gaming in general, especially PC gaming has anything to fear from Onlive for quite awhile considering the lag and the general inflexibility of the games (no modding or deep customization). People that have a good PC don't need to even touch Onlive. However, with Onlive you can play brand new games on a ten year old computer (or even a phone) which is a major plus for a lot of people!
-
I don't wish to sound racist, but they all look the same.
-
1. OnLive does not need you to have a gaming PC
2. I play Assassin's Creed with better graphics than my PS3, on my Android tablet
3. My old gaming rig (quad SLI setup) cost me around 30 to 40 bucks a month for the 1200Watts it sucked out all day... OnLive costs me just 10 bucks a month for similar graphics (Well, as compared to that old setup).
4. The new PS3s suck balls... PS3 v1.0 FTW
-
@Michaelokupejr PC means personal computer. You don't own OnLive.
-
@santu662 onlive is a pc
-
@leemster Why are you completely writing off OnLive?
-
@leemster You don't need to spend that much on a gaming pc though
pc will always win because its always changing
ps3 is old
kelly2000398 1 week ago 3
Pc = best graphics but at a cost.
Onlive = Very good and can cost VERY little amounts of cash
PS3 = worse but not bad (still good) and middle price range
Onlive wins for me cuz i can play it on my mac, pc, the console and my xperia play at only one cost.... free
FullGamingVision 2 weeks ago 3