9/11 Pentagon - Flight AA77 NTSB FDR Data Clarifications

New short video released by Pilots for 9/11 Truth.

Note : To gain a fuller understanding of what is analyzed here, please also watch...

Pandora's Black Box - Chapter Two - Flight Of American 77

Link : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8672066571196607580

Full Credit : http://pilotsfor911truth.org/

---

This video explains and refutes two key arguments often given by the gatekeepers of the "Official 9/11 Pentagon Theory" (aka pseudo skeptics) regarding the NTSB provided FDR data, supposedly from American Airlines Flight 77 (N644AA / 757 / AA77).

This analysis alone proves conclusively that the official story at the Pentagon is false.

---

Addressing common arguments of those who make excuses regarding altitude, vertical speed and position conflicts between American Airlines Flight 77 Data Recorder (Black Box) and the Govt story. The Flight Data Recorder information provided by The National Transportation Safety Board through the Freedom Of Information Act does not support the govt story.

The NTSB/FBI refuse to comment. For higher quality video, please use the download button on this page above.

---

To know more about 9/11, please visit...

- http://www.911blogger.com/
- http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/
- http://911truth.org/
- http://thepentacon.com/

There are many other 9/11 Truth websites, including...

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
http://www.ae911truth.org/

--

Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice
http://stj911.org/

--

Senior Military, Intelligence, Law Enforcement and Government Officials Question the 9/11 Commission Report
http://patriotsquestion911.com/

--- Thanks and best wishes

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• Pentagon
• Flight
• 77
• AA77
• NTSB
• FDR
• Data
• Conflict
• N644AA
• Pilotsfor911truth
• Pilots

[HABAKKUP]

There was a story of that section of the Pentagon being closed for renovation?? prior to 911!!!

[elbowbiter1]

It's like typing at a retarted kid that eats his hown shit. Where did I say I put in a lot of hard work? Not once did I say that. Since you say you haven't done the leg work and that there is no way you can use a video to acertain the veracity of your claim that hundreds of people saw the impact then... shudd da fugg up about it. You too can check out what your own eyewitnesses are actually saying but you haven't. I think you haven't because you are in denial about what's in yer koolaid.

[AlaskaFarewell]

Where the hell did you get 781? MPH? Knots? Are you F*cking kidding me?

And I don't give a damn what inprecise instruments, pushed to their limits are showing, and the fact you think they DEBUNK something is a F*cking joke.

And they don't overcome the witness statements of 104 people who saw this damn thing hit the Pentagon.

Call back when your data reflects the facts, not what you manipulated it to be.

And yes, the NTSB knows more than you, as does the Alied Pilots Association.

[rossirep]

And if all the personal fx of the people were found, how are we to beleive the engines and tail section magically disintergrated on impact?? I watched live that day, and there was no sign of a large aircraft hitting the building... why have staff immediatley picking evidence up from the lawns outside.... its all a bit odd i think????

[rossirep]

Esnir,

I have left it a good while since replying, and have looked and looked at the evidence, there is no way a passenger jet hit that building. theres no evidence of the wings colliding, or the engines coliding with either side of the whole in the wall... As for the witnesses, im sure we can all get people to lie about what we saw thanks to fear and pressure. Those witnesses were just pawns in a game my friend.

[The4LA2Baker0]

watch the free movie "Pentacon" is very well researched and documented. there is a 6 hour unedited, and a 2 hour edited version. in case you want to see the eyewitness interviews in full to make sure they aren't edited for distortion.

[LVEbonys]

He clearly states thet the NTSB provided all the data....

Just saying....

[FreeAgain2]

I respect your skills and knowledge but . . . . .

Instrument errors are rather large at low flying levels arent' they. 80' or 30' or 20' ? and at 500mph?

And don't some measurements record every second and others record every 2,3,4 seconds?

Aren't some measurements "auto off'ed" at low alts.?

Just asking . . . .

[Ryan198416]

RIP AA 77

[thedayitriedtodie]

7:53 is ur mmt of Zen.....

[ZodiacTeacher]

On a flight deck it is generally assumed that an aircraft slows down so it can catch the hook and not tear it out. That's only part true. The other reason is, they can't get close enough to the deck to catch the tail hook. And these planes are only going 150 to 200 mph tops! So now you got this obstacle plus the ship moving up and down in the water. You better thank God (or somebody) for pilots with that kind of skill and dedication to our freedom and our country. I say, "God bless them all!"