Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

(Kent Hovind) Creation Seminar 1 - Age of the Earth Part 3

These Seminars are NOT copyrighted. If you are interested in helping support Kent Hovind his video series is available on DVD at: http://shopping.drdino.com/... Kent Hovind's Creation Seminar 1 "T...  
 
Customize

More From: Joshua271987

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

208 ratings
Sign in to rate
14,008 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (461)   Options

Loading...
kkp5200 (4 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
it's pretty obvious that new species are being found in the fossil record indeed, thanks for pointing that out.. Im talking specifically about transitional species, half breeds, steps.. something that is between two KNOWN species.. I think I posted this same sentence about 10 times now..
glassbrain (4 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Yes, and? Do you need someone to google "transitional fossils", or are you going to dispute them all? It's pretty widely available stuff.

Is a platypus not a transitional animals? What about a mud skipper?
kkp5200 (4 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
looking for something that exists between two known points.
of which there should be using probability anywhere from 4 to 1000 times more common to find in the fossil record than the know species.
glassbrain (4 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Then google "transitional fossils"

I'm not sure what you're searching for here -- its all freely available information. I'm not sure why it should conform to a convoluted view that you have of how many "STEPS" there should be.

You keep referring to known points by the way - I'm guessing this is where your red herring comes in. You're expecting two animals we see today, or what?

So, how about that platypus?
kkp5200 (4 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
no red herring. no hidden motives.
glassbrain (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Excellent.
kkp5200 (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
wouldn't it be nice if finding missing links was common place, instead they find one every 10-20 years and declare, the most wonderful find, now we have a link between species, except the exact opposite should be the case, there are 10's maybe thousands of steps between species, missing links should be found as common place, and finding a regular known species should be the rare find.
glassbrain (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
They are common place, what are you talking about? Obviously you didn't google "transition fossils" otherwise this would be absolutely glaringly obvious.
glassbrain (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
How can you really complain about the literally hundreds of transitional forms we have, when given the rarity of a fossil even forming in the first place?

Typical of a creationist, you defeat them and then they decide to move the goal posts. First it was there aren't any transitional species, and now it's well there "SO FEW".

This is simply a blatant lie.
kkp5200 (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
are you referring to me asking "where are all the missing links?, they should be common"
as to me moving the goal posts?, it's just a question it's not an answer.. just trying to follow your argument.
I thought I saw a red herring there. :)

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.