I've changed my mind about evolution

The time for criticizing this theory is over. Whatever your religious beliefs, they had better not contradict it.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• evolution
• creationism
• scientific
• method
• biases
• epistemology
• admit
• was
• wrong

[imsocool7222]

People who reject evolution because of their religion are just dumb.

I hate to say it, but it's just true. When Galileo presented that the earth revolved around the sun and that things float based on their density and not just because of their shape, (all these things are true) he was critisized and his theories weren't accepted because they were thought to contradict the bible.

[spinnersmetal]

@phlizmo 99% of biologists with degrees from real universities accept evolution as the best explanation for the diversity of life. If you want to talk about the discovery institute , liberty university, and other non-accredited science programs, that doesn't count.

[scubandre1]

@whiteliketar of course!!! because we would have to listen to muslims, jehovah witness, mormons, raelians, scientoligists, flat earth theorists, young earth theorists too.... so we just stick to the evidence instead

[whiteliketar]

@scubandre1 sounds like atheist digbat macro clowns do the same. lol

[scubandre1]

The problem is creationnist DO NOT WANT TO LISTEN to the evidence of evolution. So it does'nt matter how long you try to explain it, they just cover their hears and say LALALALALALALALa. Waist of time buddy.... good luck

[glendaweil]

@L00NGB00W Sorry.

[L00NGB00W]

@glendaweil There's no need to be insulting.

This conversation is over.

[glendaweil]

@L00NGB00W I know all that dummy I do not believe macro micro got no problems with.

[L00NGB00W]

@glendaweil =)

Slowly... Over generations, towards a form favoring speed and endurance.

Same thing applies to bones. Tiny changes, from generation to generation over time.

You do understand the basic principle right?

Example:

A two legged dinosaur has two offspring, One predisposed towards being squat and powerful, the other predisposed to being lean and fast. Now they are attacked by a large predator.

The squat one dies, the lean one escapes to have lean babies. Repeat... Repeat...

[glendaweil]

@L00NGB00W Reptile to bird yea right how did the lungs evolve ever seen avian lung compared to a reptiles and birds have hollow bones to lessen weight that evolved too YEA RIGHT.

[L00NGB00W]

@glendaweil Yes, belief doesn't matter. Affirmation of the theory via discovery, practical applications, and evidence make it true.

A reptile evolves into a bird over generations, slowly modifying scales to become feathers. For reasons other than flight, mind you. Be it for warmth, or stability whilst running, or plumage... This is well documented.

Negative mutations die off. Positive mutations fare better than the unmutated.

That is the whole point of random mutation and natural selection

[glendaweil]

@L00NGB00W IYour not lying if you believe it but because you believe it does not make it true micro happens add billions and billions of years to make macro remotly possible. How does a reptile evolve in to a bird look at the bones look at the lungs your contention is over billions of years small changes made this transition possible but mutations are almost always negative and result in loss or at best very small rearrangments of genetic info.