Hittite and Historical Confusions that keep mankind in the dark
Uploader Comments (SolomonSeries)
All Comments (25)
-
the hittites were sons of ham. so were they black like the other sons of ham?according to the bible(ezekiel16 1-5)israelites came from amorites and hittites.
-
most things in the bible are prooving to be untrue, the egyptains ever have slaves, and iseral was nothing more than the new island of the middle east in those days
-
@SolomonSeries May i also ask you what code of YHWH represented? Why was this name "forbidden"?
-
@SolomonSeries you have nice avatar on your channel. What Great Sphinx was also built by Jews before "Noah"? Probably Israelian tribe of Ham built it ?! Oh my...
-
@SolomonSeries ... "Your understanding is so corrupted you should remain anonymous " yes this is the whole point about "perversions" ... "jews" (afro semites) perverted whole history by 180 degrees. Modern understanding of history is more or less based on occult stories from Torah. Many people do not realize that 1. Torah was written in 11. century AD, the oldest Torah is Leningrad Codex ...
-
Also 1. Torah was written in 11. century AD - today still known as Leningrad Codex, king Solomon never existed (his name comes from Roman "sol" (sun), Om from Aryan Om (AUM - from that also comes Levitic Osirian perversion fusion of ; Elohim; EL (plural of "god" (Anunnaki in ancient sumeria) + Aum ) ) and On from Chaldean and Egyptian term.
-
also many people do not realize that original "jewish" origin was known as "hyksos", shepherd, in Egypt as parasites, murderers, rapists. Their god was known "Osiris", their priest as Osarsiph, from Osyris, who was the god of Heliopolis, Osarsiph was later called as "Moses" (comes from Egyptian "Mes", "Messu" (meaning of "giving a birth to, ... son of - titulus of Horus, real son of Ra and not Osiris/Bacchus/Bakasura/Asura) - source: Flavius-Manetho.
-
@SolomonSeries: The sons of the chet in the bible and the sons of chet were the murders of the god lugh(=apollon lykeios) in the irish-gaelic legends about the tuatha de danann(=the danay in the iliad from homer).Cuchulainn is achilles by the greeks and the historian uchalu from cilicia.
Hittites were not Semites or Afro Semites, but Aryan civilization that spoke Indo European language; "battle in Kadesh" - even today we can translate this term normally through Slavic & Sanskrit language ("hebrew" - levitic origin is a hoax); "Desh" means "land" in Sanskrit or Deshela in Slovene language, when Ka comes from "great" (Kan, Khan - from that comes also "Khaganat" that "jews" - hyksos started to claim as "their own" )
VendPrekmurec 11 months ago
Your assumptions are merely that.....You for one are assuming the people of the Bible were all Semitic, and this is clearly not the case. Only HALF of the current Levitical priesthood test with the "Aaron Haplotype". Problem is your assumptions about the Hittites are as in error as the theological assumption that the Israelites were Semitic.....Meanwhile Semitic merely means the people of Shem. Your understanding is so corrupted you should remain anonymous. Oh, you do.
SolomonSeries 11 months ago
Historians don't think the Hittites in the bible are the same people that existed mainly due to them being long gone before Rome even existed, they were gone by 400 or so years before hand.
It'd be hard to dispute as the records from the Hittites are from their libraries 4-5 or of them so most records of just about everything can be found out about them.
zagan1 1 year ago
Your comments on Hittites are noted.Noted to be in error, that is.The Hittites disappeared long before you state, and derive their name indirectly from a Biblical source.The problem is that the word "Hittite" to the archaeologist and the theologian is used to describe two different people groups.Both groups are in the Bible, but carrying differing labels lost over the span of time. The Hittites of history and archaeology are amazing to study, whereas the Bible has them as rather insignificant.
SolomonSeries 1 year ago