Best Evidence - McMinnville UFO case
Uploader Comments (redstarfilms)
All Comments (69)
-
@vortexx76 planet***correction sorry
-
Despite what the EXPERTS have said......half of you people still refuse to believe
It's human nature to be ignorant...remember we used to think the earth was flat and the universe revolved around our plant...
If you disagreed you would be killed...things haven't changed
-
Nerds, all of ya! Yammerin all the time about little green men hiding in the root cellar...ya'll crazy as hoot owls!
-
This object is a german disc craft from 1930 operating out of colorado.
-
@Markemark44 What? Your sex life?
-
@aaronvan9999 Oh Wow, glad you cleared that up, Einstein. Now we can all rest. I'll give the Navy physicist, a photograpy expert, a call and tell him that you solved it. Thanks!
-
excuse me but, wasn't this filmed back in the 50's?back then they didn't have the resources to fake these things.............wake up people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111
-
will post the full on believers later...lazy
-
Skeptics said its too blurry cant be real. why are there clearer photos.....wait...this one is tooooo clear.....that cant be real. no no we dont know what that is....but it is not there just camera playing tricks on ya....wait wait it was something going on in the atmosphere that created this optical ollusion. no...i mean its planes...hold up its um um.....weather balloons....flares? >.> you all are crazy. you want to see it so you see it.
-
It's suspicious for many reasons. The fact that is is flying at a tilt is high suspect. The claim that it couldn't be faked is also bogus. He could have used a skeet machine or sling to launch skeet targets (which can look just like this) and photographed them in flight, this would explain the odd tilt of the thing. Very suspicious and not credible overall.
Sorry - I can only upload one or two clips, given the commercial requirements of the production. The concluding segment will be available shortly, and at some point I'll add some bonus materials from interview footage that didn't appear in the film itself.
redstarfilms 4 years ago
Arcticfox1:
I appreciate what you're saying, but I trust the viewer to be able to place everything in context, and differentiate between the photos and a recreation demonstrating how the object allegedly moved leading up to the photos being taken.
redstarfilms 4 years ago
Miah:
Correct.
Paul Kimball
redstarfilms 4 years ago