Global Warming Lies

Submitted for peer-review.

The Hockey Stick graph is a lie. The lies of omission about the size of man's role in global temperature are titanic. It seems to me one should experience a little warming when coming out of a Little Ice Age.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• climate
• global warming
• warming trend
• warming
• global
• lies
• hoax
• fraud
• cooling
• al gore
• inconvenient truth
• cru
• hacked
• emails
• University of East Anglia
• climate research unit
• divergence problem
• schweingruber variation
• reflected
• solar
• radiation
• climategate
• earth day
• mike's nature trick
• hide the decline environment

[NewFormofSilence]

It's amazing that so few people understand the gravity of the divergence "problem". I mean, dendroclimatology produces a prediction (the temperature graph) and hard data proves that prediction to be wrong. I wouldn't call that a "problem", I'd call that a catastrophe. But no, they keep using the graphs as if nothing happened. Unbelievable.

[AssumptionTruncheon]

@NewFormofSilence

Agreed.

I would call that a fascinating study in the guided perception of memes.

[clgrayson1]

That's funny, I'd never heard of this group till today. I get all my information from the AAAS, NAS, NOAA and NASA. Why would I go anywhere else for my scientific information????

[AssumptionTruncheon]

@clgrayson1

Do you happen to know the AAAS explanation of viking farms found in Greenland's permafrost?

I have never heard a believeable answer to this simple question of thermodynamics.

It baffles me that archeological and historical evidence would carry less weight than tree rings.

[drkstrong]

@AssumptionTruncheon Cut and run when you have no more arguments.

[drkstrong]

@AssumptionTruncheon I just told you they threw out data that could no longer be read - read the reports- it was on 7 track tapes and paper tapes - I have not seen one of those in 20 years. Further they has no obligation to supply data to anyone especially when it is available elsewhere. Jones made that clear in the email he sent to the requestor - he gave the guy the links to go get his own data and correctly pointed out that CRU is a university research group not a national archive.

[AssumptionTruncheon]

@drkstrong

You're cut off, doc.

You are selling something you don't understand.

The difference between me and you is that I'll admit to it.

Good day, sir.

[AssumptionTruncheon]

@drkstrong

You have just admitted to me that the CRU threw out data. Which causes me to need the resources to pay a team of men multiple years to go to the NCDC and figure out. This is another layer of obfuscation, doc.

The fact that you can't understand that shows alot to me.

Phil Jones and You do not get to decide what is a "harassing" request. ALL REQUESTS FOR DATA ARE OPENLY RESPONDED TO. If you do not look for flaws in the theory, how do you know it is solid?

This is SCIENCE, man!

[drkstrong]

@AssumptionTruncheon It would probably take 1 person working alone that long but not a team which is what you would have in a research project. The ten years was meant to illustrate how much data is available and always has been. The data requests from CRU were not to get the data but an attempt to harass them and divert them from their work because everybody knows (except those that choose not to) that you can get the same data from the NCDC or the original sources. The same thing with Mann