Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Superiority of Pendulum Drive - Potential Energy to Kinetic Energy

Veljko Milkovic demonstrates a simple experiment showing the change of potential to kinetic energy and proving the energy excess is possible with the pendulum drive. Veljko Milkovic - Superiority ...  
 
Customize

More From: Ulianot

Loading...
Play All Stop Autoplaying | Play Next

QuickList(0)

1
Clear | Save

Related Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
22 ratings
Sign in to rate
10,829 views
Flag
close
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
close
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
close
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...
Sign in to post a Video Response

Video Responses (1)

View All - Play All
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (49)   Options

Loading...
Raystonn (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The mere existence of the pendulum is not being debated. The use of the pendulum is. When you roll the ball , the pendulum sits there doing nothing but adding mass to the system. When you swing the ball on the pendulum, the pendulum is also lifted in addition to the ball, adding further potential energy. This energy is released as both the pendulum and the ball have their potential energy converted to kinetic energy.
Raystonn (1 month ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
I'm amazed that I'm the first to point out that the heavy pendulum the ball is attached to is also falling and contributing energy. Unless he pendulum itself has no mass, this experiment is invalid. Perhaps he could try measuring the movement caused by the pendulum without the ball. I'd bet on it being close to 20cm. The ball only contributes close to 10cm of movement, whether on the pendulum or not.
Ulianot (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
The pendulum without the ball was also attached there when we tried to measure path passed by using rolling ball.
We do not believe the presence of the mass of pendulum rod made experiment invalid because it was there in both cases.
mityno1 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The propulsion force is very deceptive.

The energy propelling the cart is the hand "winding up" the pendulum "uphill" against gravity, as if the pendulum were a spring. Releasing the pendulum is like releasing a spring. The cart won't work with a self-contained motor, the forces cancel.

NASA has a paper called, "Responding to Mechanical Antigravity" that explains why no mechanisms have achieved linear thrust in free space.

Google: NASA/TM—2006-214390
click "I'm feeling lucky"
ronmann606 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
@runaway9413 your a dumb ass the ruler is in 5cm increments.
ronmann606 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Why do you move so slow?
MarkTwist20 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
You need glasses cause you don't see very well. Or you can't read metric system?
The axis of the back wheels is at 0cm and the back wheels passed the path of 10.5 cm!
runaway9413 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Look at the size ratio of the car the person and the distance it traveled that guy is using a millimeter scale or something
runaway9413 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
And metric rulers don't go by 5 cm with 5 millimeter increments in between
MarkTwist20 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Your sense of perception is not good - the size of an adult hand is min. 15 cm - compare his hand with the ruler and you will see it's a metric ruler.
It goes by 5cm because it's school blackboard ruler. We had the same one in high school.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.