Upload

More False History From David Barton

RWWBlog RWWBlog·1,530 videos
12,863
2,420
Like     Dislike 2

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like RWWBlog's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike RWWBlog's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add RWWBlog's video to your playlist.

Published on Oct 1, 2012

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content...

David Barton claims Lincoln issued this prayer proclamation "at a time when the nation really was doing well"... even though it was just a few months after the start of the Civil War.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

All Comments (198)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • Angelalynx999

    That's the sort of fucked up logic I've come to expect from god believers. Start a fight and when things don't go the way you want, claim the victim. That's why you berated me for criticizing your typing, even though I never did. It's probably a good thing you're taking psychology. You might just be able to figure out just how screwed up you are. ;)

    I also love that when I asked for evidence you go right to the first cause and nothing else. How pathetic.

    Now be a dear and pout in silence. ^_^

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Angelalynx999's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Angelalynx999's comment.
    in reply to ZARVOE (Show the comment)
  • ZARVOE

    Actually your the aggresor, and if you wont read a wall of text then how is it I wa supposed to offer any evidence? Thats why I wouldnt. With a 500 Chara limit, itd be impractical, and given that you wont lisen to anyones views that disagee with yoru own, not wirht a biother.

    But you did make it a poitn to tell me Im not worth it, which only means I am.

    

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ZARVOE's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ZARVOE's comment.
    in reply to Angelalynx999 (Show the comment)
  • Angelalynx999

    Actually, I say you aren't worth my time because I have 3 projects and a crap ton of homework to finish by next week. What you are talking about, while an interesting distraction, is ultimately meaningless. I already know you won't provide evidence for the existence of a god and all you are doing is a form of a shell game.

    Oh, and I love the wall of text. I didn't read any of it but it sure shows you to be mental as hell!

    It's hard to claim to be the victim when you're the aggressor.

    Goodnight!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Angelalynx999's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Angelalynx999's comment.
    in reply to ZARVOE (Show the comment)
  • ZARVOE

    Those who have to mak a show of heir bravado by insulting others and tellin them they arent worth their Time really mean thatthey have no honest answers for them, but wish to maintaint he illusion of superiority. You say Im not worth your Time only because you know in the end you arent as Logical or Rational as you pretend.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ZARVOE's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ZARVOE's comment.
    in reply to Angelalynx999 (Show the comment)
  • ZARVOE

    Theres a difference between an effect wth an unknown caue and an effect with no cause.

    And God isnt just an anser liek 'Goddidit", thats the kidn of gcrap argument invented by peopel liek you then pretextually added to Theists.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ZARVOE's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ZARVOE's comment.
    in reply to Angelalynx999 (Show the comment)
  • ZARVOE

    if youve decided a priori to see Theology as a nontopic or Theologians as a crude insult, then you relalywotn look into it. You cant. in order to look into it you have to be hioenst with ehat peopel say and how they approach a topic. Youve decided they beelvie ithout evidence and just dont have any real evidence, and that is dogma to you.

    By the way, Im not a fanatic.

    Im actually quiet open to diverse beelfis and have defended from fslse claism everything.

    heck yoru facts before you accuse.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ZARVOE's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ZARVOE's comment.
    in reply to Angelalynx999 (Show the comment)
  • ZARVOE

    You did go on th atack here. The first post I replied to was an attack.

    Sayign Im wrogn abotu an obvious Truth isnt exactly gign to win favours.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ZARVOE's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ZARVOE's comment.
    in reply to Angelalynx999 (Show the comment)
  • ZARVOE

    I didnt say the supernatural was explainable by natural laws. I said it was explainable. The hign is, somehgin doesnt have to be explainable by Natural laws to be Explainable.

    Your simply b4ing obtuse and rather shallow intellectually again.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ZARVOE's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ZARVOE's comment.
    in reply to Angelalynx999 (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later