@takoma5 The biggest f-up was the way that the 2-door hardtop was designed. The way the side rear windows were designed was just too f-ugly! The front end styling I could live with; if you think about it, the '59's front end styling was nothing special, either.
This commercial (jingle and all) emphasizes the "unibody" construction Chrysler introduced that year. And the cars WERE very smooth riders with almost no rattles/squeaks.
What a strange commercial lol. I get it, no more shake rattle or roll.
Rydo182 2 months ago
Might of had unibody construction, but the car always sounded like the wheels were going to fall off....
Shanklinthomas 4 months ago
Cars were batter built in back then. Unlike the ones they build now, made of fiberglass. The back of them looked like the Batmobile
Sheri451 5 months ago 2
not a bad looking car
sb57fury1 5 months ago in playlist sb57fury1's Favorited Videos
@thespeez yes, i guess youre right about that..but in my book the 59 model is still very much acceptable!!
takoma5 5 months ago
@takoma5 The biggest f-up was the way that the 2-door hardtop was designed. The way the side rear windows were designed was just too f-ugly! The front end styling I could live with; if you think about it, the '59's front end styling was nothing special, either.
thespeez 5 months ago
@thespeez jepp, thats true..overall the 1960 model was ugly compared to the 1957-58 and 59 models
takoma5 5 months ago
@takoma5 - This was one of the few models in which the two-door hardtops weren't as good looking as the 'post models or the four-door hardtops, JMO.
thespeez 5 months ago
This commercial (jingle and all) emphasizes the "unibody" construction Chrysler introduced that year. And the cars WERE very smooth riders with almost no rattles/squeaks.
RobDog65 7 months ago
immense boot storage space....
pmay222 11 months ago