Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Creationists are Scientists Too: CrEvo Rant # 213 with Wazooloo

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
4,272
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 13, 2009

http://wazooloo.com
http://ianjuby.org In this rant, Ian responds to Dr. Brian Alters, who ripped into the Canadian Science and Technology minister, Gary Goodyear.

  • likes, 105 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (286)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Just stick to being an *Ice Road Trucker*

  • ...that said, I, for one, do not dismiss evolution on blind faith. I once considered the possibility of evolutionary creation. But the more I study the theory of evolution and the surrounding sciences in general, the more I come to realize that even if it's guided, large-scale evolution is simply impossible. I don't reject evolution because I'm a creationist. I'm a creationist because evolution has been ruled out.

  • ...but not because we want it to be. Because of the evidence of testimony. The bible has enough evidence backing it up to prove it to be the truth in a court of law. For thousands of years it's been tested and found error-free. Furthermore, the work of God is abundantly evident today in bonafide, verified, impossible-by-natural-means miracles. That's why we accept the creation account in genesis as authoritative. (continued)

  • Watch the mythbusters. What happens when they test a myth and it appears busted, but they have a reliable report that it actually happened? They accept the report as true and work to discover the reason for the discrepency. Do they disregard the report because it's not scientifically provable? No, they accept it as true because of the proof of testimony. That's still perfectly valid science. Yes, we Christians start with the notion that the bible is true. (continued)

  • Maybe this ignorant should look up evolution in wikipedia, see how we do know that evolution is a fact, and how it is being used in practice in science, in the medical industry and so on.: )

  • @cpkruschke " and Evolutionists start with a conclusion-that the Bible ISN'T literally true"

    The bible is irrelevant in biological science. Along with the quran and ALL holy books.

    Furthermore, there is no such thing as "Evolutionist".

    You are a moron.

  • If creationists were scientists then they would be doing science. But they aren't.

    They aren't publishing papers with discoveries or showing any results of their claims.

    Creationists are not scientists. They are story weavers and con-artists.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more