Debunking 9/11 Myths - Popular Mechanics

Jim Miegs get's his hypothetical @$$ handed to him in this short segment of video debunking the lies being sold by Popular Mechanics

FEMA Report Appendix C:
http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf

9/11 Experiments: The Mysterious Eutectic:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQDFV1HINw

November 1935 issue of Popular Mechanics debunks Jim Miegs' claims that thermite can't be used to demolish steel structures:
http://911blogger.com/news/2011-08-25/skyride-tower-felled-melting-steel-legs

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Jim Miegs
• Popular Mechanics
• educational
• 9/11
• debunk

[WakeUpToTheNWO]

!!! Popular Mechanics DEBUNKED !!!

Who is Benjamin Chertoff, the "senior researcher" at Popular Mechanics?

American Free Press learned that he is none other than a cousin of Michael Chertoff, the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (and the man currently responsible for selling the NAKED BODY SCANNERS to the TSA - through the DHS).

Popular Mechanics has a vested FINANCIAL INTEREST in supporting the OFFICAL LIE - because they are profiting from it !

[MYAR15SaysImFree]

nothing the lamestream media will ever say will make me change my mind. I took construction engineering in college and took steel structure, concrete, physics and strength of materials classes. and what I saw on 911 and the explanation from the "experts" is a total lie

[ibeawakened]

EXCELLENT VIDEO!!! REAL GREAT WORK! Anyone who believes the official version, I ask you, IF WE LIVE IN A FREE COUNTRY, WHY IS THE "OFFICIAL" VERSION THE ONLY ONE WE GET TO HEAR ABOUT ON THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA???? as a wise person said, "TRUTH DOES NOT FEAR INVESTIGATION", why AREN'T ALL SIDES GIVEN THE SAME AMOUNT OF COVERAGE?? We do not live a free country, We live in a country that is CONTROLLED FREEDOM. Defend what's left of the constitution WHILE YOU CAN!

[dw1992]

Wow, it's pretty bad that you had to find evidence from 1935 to make another ludicrous claim. Usually, explosives leave a copper residue in the aftermath of an explosion on steel. Evidence supporting that claim are no were to be found in Ground Zero. Thermite is used with sparklers, and doesn't explode on it's own. And do you really think an idiot like Bush could have caused 9/11? "WAKE UP HURRR DURRR!"

[waitew]

The Pentagon was hit at the point farthest from the military leadership (NMCC etc),in a section mostly empty (5 of 6 normally there weren't),in the only section with full fire sprinkler coverage and the only one with walls reinforced with steel & kevlar designed to resist bomb blasts & contain debris.It was struck perfectly to contain wreckage within the building & minimize penetration.Is this all coincidence?911 doubled defense spending & allowed us to invade the Middle East.911=inside job.

[dennisjo88]

1500 experts with all brainwached crap??....

and mainsteam media and the goverment with hardcore facts...it sounds perfect but only if the world is a place when its upside down....

its is a strange thing tjese days ..to say conspyracies for nutcases against experts that can show in different elements "with the term: beyond reasonable doubt that they can show with evidence suddenly that all doesnt matter for some...

its all a lie

itsa sad thing these days ..

[batvette]

@MYAR15SaysImFree "I took construction engineering in college... ...and what I saw on 911 and the explanation from the "experts" is a total lie"

Well if you have such a background in academia you should know that merely placing doubt upon a position with scientific consensus backed by peer reviewed research papers is not in itself a credible argument.

Use your expertise to produce a paper with dissenting theory and present it to a peer review publication and see it it withstands scrutiny.

[batvette]

@Thor9669 That was an interesting little rant.

That was not a peer reviewed paper published in a scientific journal offering a credible alternative theory of the towers' collapse.

science requires we discard beliefs of the ranting ideologue and grasp evidence consistent with the scientific method.

[Thor9669]

@batvette

Another brain-washed fool who believe in this crap!!!

Look at your country.. after 9-11 there is nothing left of your great america!!!

just a bunch of war-sick zionist pricks who think they can rule the world,, keep watching your lame-stream media and dream on!!

[batvette]

@Thor9669 In the end your claim the NIST report is debunked is either blatant dishonesty or willful ignorance. Any such research paper or report is NOT debunked by a few yahoos who make remarks about doubting a detail or two or even a dozen within, science does not work like that. They have to publish an alternative theory in a credible peer review journal and see it stand up to scrutiny. They can't! Sound science does not reject overwhelming consensus for fringe theory which is not complete.

[batvette]

@Thor9669 Have A & E 911 truth published a research paper in a peer review journal detailing an alternative theory for the towers' collapse? Hell no. Such real professionals they are willing to risk their careers pushing crackpot theories which is why Jones got ousted from BYU. Why don't you CT's just forget your silly fantasy and stop shooting America in the foot, haven't you done enough damage already? People always look for an excuse to topple #1,you're giving it to them. Grow up.