Treatment at the Burzynski Clinic - KHOU Part 1
Top Comments
All Comments (26)
-
So far 4 of the studies I have taken a quick look at have only proven my point further.......
-
Overall, the results of this review do not justify the use of HDC with SCR as a standard therapy for children with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. However, all reported studies were possibly subject to significant bias, especially selection bias. This might have underestimated the measured effect of HDC. As a result, a clinically important excess of adverse risk patients in the HDC arms may explain the non-beneficial effect of HDC.
-
High dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer.
Although there is evidence that high dose chemotherapy and autograft significantly improves event-free survival compared to conventional chemotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer there is NO significant evidence of benefit in overall survival.
-
So I am assuming you looked through all 300, to verify that they did in fact prove the efficacy of chemotherapy? I am starting to look through them now.... first two I have looked at aren't looking good, they seem to be actually refuting your claims. Please take the time to send me VIA PM the one's which prove the efficacy of chemotherapy. I will take the time to show you some that prove me correct.
-
@NeutralExistence I would have posted a list of results, but youtube didn't let me post that many results.
-
@NeutralExistence google "cochrane library". Enter the word "chemotherapy" and take your pick from 300 results.
-
Don't make me laugh, hundreds of trials showing its efficacy?
""
Proof of efficacy of a cancer treatment such as chemotherapy requires a randomised trial in which it has been shown that the group treated with chemotherapy experienced a significantly increased survival when compared with that of an untreated group.
""
Show me these Pubmed articles, I would love to see them considering such a test has never been done to prove chemo's efficacy.
-
@NeutralExistence what makes you think there's no evidence that chemotherapy reduces cancer? A simple Pubmed search will show hundreds of clinical trials that show its efficacy. A simple Cochrane Library search will show hundreds of systematic reviews showing the efficacy of chemotherapy.
-
The real question is why does the FDA approve chemotherapy which has shown NO proof of reducing cancer in randomized trials? Considering the harmful side effects, and the expensive cost of chemotherapy, which is only reduced due to the fact its insurable while Burzysnki's treatment is not, it sure seems like a hypocritical stance that has absolutely no science to back it up. You will find most of the people attacking Burzysnki have a personal bias.
-
@Matthewsoto95 You gotta watch the movie about his cancer treatment to understand WHY FDA is playing games with him for over 30 years now. FDA is the biggest greediest whore organisation that has been ever created. You will be shocked to find out what this brilliant man had to go through. Watch the movie "Cancer is serious business" If you have Netflix, it is available for viewing there.
Please go to change.org and sign the petition to the FDA to legalize Antineoplastons. Type in Antineoplastons in the search and it will take you to the petition. Share this with your friends and family!! Please help with this.
MicrotronicUS 7 months ago 16
I like this interviewer. She asks intelligent questions and gives her guests a chance to speak. MUCH better than Oprah!! (who I don't bother to watch anymore).
NP1D305 1 year ago 9