Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Re; Earth is 6,000 Years Old (5 of 5)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,685
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 9, 2008

part 5

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Haha he keeps wiping his face. His lies are making him sweat profusely.

    I like how he compares nature's formations to humans' imitation of those formations. Humans' formations are purposefully designed to speed up the process!!! "They're not gonna wait millions of years." Of course not!! They can change variables to speed it up!!! Why wait?!?

  • Real reason he keeps wiping the sweat from his head? He's scared it might turn into rock and "fossilize" him.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Re; Earth is 6,000 Years Old (4 of 5)
see all

All Comments (78)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I wear lab coats so people take me srsly, i am a dickhole IRL.

  • *wipes sweat off forehead* "I hope they are believing my bullshit"

  • @coolvideo28 Belief is the accepting of a claim, so yes, I believe the claim that you are willfully ignorant. Now prove me wrong, and come up with some evidence that you are correct.

  • @Jonstern1983 maybe if you repeat that 300 times you will start to believe it. Once again real slow for You

    B Y E

  • @coolvideo28 You've done nothing but say, "I don't understand your argument therefore I'm right." That's not defeating and argument, that's showing your own inability and unwillingness to understand the world around you.

  • @Jonstern1983 Please try again people live in all those places. I have defeated every weak argument you have brought up, You are now running to insults as evolutionists always do after they have been defeated your boring me now bye.

  • @coolvideo28 Central Australia, Antarctica, The North Pole.  Three for the price of one. Your inability to grasp simple concepts, like there being more planets than Earth, The clouds not always being at consistent locations, and the fact that Star Wars and not Star Trek is the IP that has "The Force" written into it just proves that either you don't read the arguments, you're a troll, or you are the single stupidest human being on the face of the planet.

  • @Jonstern1983 tell me a place on earth that people dont live at then ? The rest your mumbling about makes no sense.

  • @coolvideo28 7. Not only is the universe not perfect for sustaining life, the Earth itself isn't. There are entire swathes of land that are nearly or completely uninhabitable (deserts, ice flows, etc.). Add to that the fact that, life is an eternal struggle, and that hardy seems like something an omnibenevolent god would choose to create. There 7 fallacies in less than 500 characters... Alright, two of them were repeats, and one of them was due to ignorance about pop culture... still 5.

  • @coolvideo28 5. Star WARS not Star Trek, is the thing with the force, which is a lot more similar to Chopra's idea of universal consciousness than it is to gravity. 6. We have already proven that there is an attraction between object, the burden of proof is on you, because you are making a positive statement of the cause of this particular aspect of demonstrable reality, I simply say that the fact that bodies attract at a consistent rate under normal circumstances does exist.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more