Barack Hussein Obama: Deficits don't matter anymore

Liberal talking-heads, include Barack Hussein Obama whined, moaned, belly-ached and cried for years that Bush's deficits were going to cause massive economic harm. They're right, deficit spending is not a good idea, so Obama's decided to double-down on Bush's deficit spending and then some. Do I smell hypocrisy?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/02/26/obamas-budget-overview-predicts-tr...

http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/02/26/fy2009-deficit-fy2000-spending/

http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/02/26/obama-budget-irresponsibility-incon...

http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=44429

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Barack
• Hussein
• Obama
• Osama
• Bin
• Biden
• deficit
• spending
• Timothy
• Geithner
• avoids
• paying
• taxes
• trillion
• dollar
• deficits
• TARP
• bailout
• Citigroup
• Bear
• Stearns
• AIG
• Great
• Depression

[UTubekookdetector]

LUVIT: Actually, in the last video we debated on, you called me a "GOP fanboy" and accused me of stumping for Bush a bit too much. I've read what you said. "debt under Reagan" Basic civics failure, see watch?v=1iWcI39GOyc (I reference this so I don't have to repeat myself, it irritates me) "Bush era programs" Actually, the biggest budget-busters were around long before Bush (Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, interest payments on the debt). Why did Obama promise a net cut in spending?

[luvitluvitbaby]

@UTubekookdetector I never asserted that you didn't think Bush was a big spender. You are hearing voices again. I realize that the debt has gone up substantially since Obama took office. However, Obama's programs only make up 11% of the debt and 4% of the deficit. Almost 50% of the debt was due to Bush era programs.

Republicans had no problem tripling the debt under Reagan and doubling the debt under Bush, but now it's a problem because a Democrat is in office? LOL! You guys are unreal! LMAO!

[UTubekookdetector]

LUVIT: Again, you most-likely have not watched many of my vids if you're asserting that I don't think Bush was a big-spender. I've told you this about 5 times now, I won't say it again. From FY 2008-11 (and Obama's first two FY's) the Dems controlled Congress. In Obama's first 2 years,they had at least 58 Sens. Obama was and isn't serious about cutting spending, he just used it to get elected. So now you're angry the GOP is saying no to Obama's spending binge. Hilarious!

[luvitluvitbaby]

@UTubekookdetector ...continued

You really need to watch this video! This will give you some insight on our debt.

/watch?v=P1bZ-TiX8rA&feature=r­elated

[luvitluvitbaby]

@UTubekookdetector O.K. so what are you saying? Because Democrats held a slight majority in the senate for Bush's first two years that relieves him of any responsibility over his screwed up policy positions? lol!

Bush didn't have to buy votes! Back then you had moderate Democrats and Republicans in Congress so there was more room for bi-partisan deals.

Since Obama became President, the GOP has opted to listen to Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck and say NO to everything the President says yes to.

[UTubekookdetector]

LUVIT: More-of-the-same. Trying to cover-up Obama's broken spending promises (promised to halve the deficit and a net cut in spending, couldn't do that w/a Dem Congress). If G.W. Bush were serious about balancing the budget, he shouldn't have put more troops all over the globe, signed NCLB, the Med. Mod. Act, TARP, etc. I firmly believe Ron Paul would not try to get along w/these knuckleheads, he would force them to override his vetoes. Obama=G.W. Bush on spending.

[UTubekookdetector]

LUVIT: You're just plain dumb. Apparently you don't watch many of my vids, nor have you paid any attention to what I said. Just a few days ago I said Bush & the GOP decided to spend and buy votes. You're either afflicted with ADHD and can't concentrate for 5 seconds or you're being disingenuous. I see you got upset after I corrected you on the Senate totals for Bush's first 2 years. You said the GOP had control, when I corrected you w/the facts, you threw a fit. Please do better.

[luvitluvitbaby]

@UTubekookdetector Am I mad? Not really, just amused.

Your whole buying votes argument is WEAK! Just admit that your dear GOP party screwed up.

Woo-hoo-hoo-hoo Democrats narrowly controlled the Senate for a measly two years 2001-2003. Budgetary bills originate in the house, and that was controlled by the GOP!

The Tea Party believes in fiscal prudence, but not the rest of the GOP!

Dick Gephardt was the leader of House Dems then and was never SPEAKER!

[luvitluvitbaby]

@UTubekookdetector You want to talk about broken promises? Ronald Reagan promised his plan would reduce our debt and balance the budget. Bush 41 said "read my lips...no new taxes!" I recall Bush 43 saying his budget plan would pay down the debt in record time!

What happened?

All politicians do this, not just Obama!

[UTubekookdetector]

LUVIT: Ok, it seems on the issue of blacks & the welfare state, we are in agreement, correct? The welfare state has subsidized poverty & irresponsibility, no wonder we have a lot of both. If you're a successful black man, the credit most likely goes to your parents & your work ethic. The public school system has also hurt blacks. I never implied all blacks are on welfare, but most of them are born out-of-wedlock, which is certainly not good.