Change Player Size

Global Warming: From "If" to "When"

The debate about global warming has now shifted from "if" to "when" . . . and we can't just sit and wait.  
 

More From: healthpolitics

Loading...

QuickList(0)

265 ratings
Sign in to rate
118,920 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (2)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (822)   Options

Loading...
mlev3 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
How about the pacific decadal oscillation? Seems our temps follow that cycle rather closely. I think I'm sticking with my current belief that we will always be warming, cooling, or just basically staying the same and there is nothing we can do to change it.
chrisobe (9 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
too much CO2 is bad. its effect is like that of what we commonly call polluntants. but it hurts all of us everywhere . lets stop it . less oil + coal and more renewables asap. and buy less crap food like meat and burgers . they suck a lot of resources into their production.
jontegan (10 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
you sir are a fraud
matildaz (10 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
I'm a meteorologist and the misinformation here is outrageous. Global temps flat since 1998 and down since 2002. China emits more CO2 than USA. Debate rages in science comm and hardly "settled". CO2 is not "pollution". Tsunamis and global warming? Puhleeze. Katrina and global warming? No...just wrong storm in wrong place with poor response. Kyoto? Waste of money and USA doing better than many countries that did sign it.

CO2 increasing and earth has warmed slightly but it's a big non-issue.
GlueSniffer4Life (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
You're a moron, not a meteorologist. 1998 was a year of unusually strong El Nino event. Nice cherrypicking of data. Now global temperatures are reaching 1998 levels without any help of El Nino.

Katrina was not caused by GW and no scientist ever claimed otherwise. Chine emits far less per capita than USA. Don't sign the fucking protocol if you don't want to, just improve your energy efficiency and reduce your insane thirst for oil greasy lardasses.
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
contagiousYawn (11 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Cosmic rays entering the earth are at a record high. Why is that important? That causes cooling in the earth. And there is scientific evidence to show this; it's not just a hypothesis. The earth is going to continue to cool.

Watch this YouTube title to learn about it:


Space weather and climate change EUXTV
BipedalMammal (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Global warming... LOL.

Pollution is a real problem. "Global warming" is BULLSHIT.
ReduceGHGs (10 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
News flash....
CO2 is now considered pollutant.
Why is that?

Almost anything, even substances that are essential for life, in excess can be harmful.

Read what the experts say.
Google...
Scientific Opinion on Climate Change Wiki

For the sake of our future generations (the future "us"), its time we moved to sustainable living.

WeCanSolveIt(dot)org
cloudsifter11 (1 year ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
yah, what a bunch of jerkoffs these 'global warming' morphed into 'climate change' when the first term didn't work out...ahahahahaha
Google:

"The world has never seen such freezing heat"

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.