Do Galapagos Finches Prove Evolution?

Or at least can they be used as an objective evidence?
Thanks to http://www.coldwatermedia.com

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• origin
• of
• species
• charles
• darwin
• evolution
• natural
• selection
• survival
• the
• fittest
• mutation
• evidence
• proof
• ColdWater
• Media

[CognosSquare]

Evolution is a fact. Things change (evolve) over time. Same animals that lived 100 million years ago dont live today.

I may piss you off HighFlyingDutchman but it does not change a that.

There are plenty muslims beliving in evolution (ive googled). You are bright enough to understand it. Cant you just incorporate it into your belief?

To me evolution does not even seem to take anything away from belief. So what if god created evolution?

[HighFlyingDutchman]

Yo-Ho

I am already studying biology at university

And I probably know "even" more than you about this theory

And I also know how much of it is fact(variations,adaptations,na­tural selection)

And I also know how much of it is all about a hopeless dream to happen(the dead to alive matter - no information to perfect systems - stupid bacteria to "stupid" humans THROUGH RANDOM MUTATIONS)

I hope this didnt piss you off ma' friend :D

Cheers

[TheGospelDude]

Evolution my ass, that's Adaptation. Evolutionist Morons, lol =)

[HighFlyingDutchman]

evolution .... PISS ME OOOOFF :DDDD

hehe

[SuperZwinky10]

can you please tell me where i can find the whole documentary

thanks

[4ndiland]

i like the fact that they talked about the difference between micro and macro evolution. certainly everyone can agree on micro-evolution, i can't imagine anyone denying that.

[ebronken]

Well, and then we have the case of mutations, which largely suffises to explain makro-evolution.

Now, let me say this clearly: considering the massive evidence, in the shape of fossils, there is no doubt about the fact that an evolution has taken place. These species surface in a certain order, you see.

Furthermore there is no alternative explanation. God does not exist. The world is filled with proof of his absence, so please, just get real about this.

[joebot1]

Every real scientist that is being objective!.

There is currently about m0.1 percent of scientists (all theists by the way) that do not belief ion evolution and it is always for pseudo theistic/political reasons!.

It's pretty silly that these people pursue this avenue knowing full well they haven't a leg to stand on factually or scientifically!.

They are deluded fools that seem to equate evolution with immorality, they are in short, idiots!.

[TheGospelDude]

Not every scientist :)

[joebot1]

taught as degree's?, you mean academic degree's, degrees as evolution works in stages, degrees - ppl teach evolution to a degree, less so from place to place?

[joebot1]

I really don't see what point your trying to make, are you saying that evolutionary biologists are 'comfortable with evolution' and have to think about it for it to be this...or else evolution woudl not work in degrees??.

What??, please define your argument because as it stands your making very little sense to me!.

[joebot1]

Your simply playing with language. Evolution is widely accepted by pretty much everyone with a brain, the only ppl that 'don't feel comfortable' with evolution are ppl with a theistic axe to grind and it is worse than that because these ppl want to push their unfounded, unscientific ideas on everyone else.

Worse still, these ppl link 'Darwinism' (what ever that is) with eugenics or immorality, which is complete nonsense!.

[imadhurata]

my statement was based on the fact they are doing robust thinking, if evolution as it stands sits at ease for the one group that should fully feel at ease with it, then they wouldn't feel the need for robust thinking, and hence evolution wouldn't be taught as degrees. the fact that there are evolutions working is proof.

i think we are in two different leagues, my friend. i really don't think a continued dialogue would be productive.

[imadhurata]

now, the science of evolution can render alot of benifit, and i'm sure there will be robust thinking, but doesn't make those fundermental assumptions more established.