Rush Limbaugh on Hannity Part 2: The Future of Conservatism

This is part two of Sean Hannity's interview with Rush Limbaugh. Sean and Rush discussed the future of conservatism. Rush says that the Republican Party is making a big mistake by trying to cater to groups of people rather than individuals.

Rush discussed President Obamas recent meeting with conservative journalists in Washington. He addressed criticism of conservatives from northeastern liberal Rockefeller Republicans, David Brooks and Colin Powell. Rush said that northeastern Republicans are embarrassed to be in the same party with pro-life Southern Republicans who attend NASCAR races. Rush reminded everyone that liberal Republicans got the candidate they wanted in John McCain and it was a disaster.

They also discuss the tax cheat Tim Geithner, liberal ethics and how Obama is too big too fail.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Rush
• Limbaugh
• Sean
• Hannity
• Fox
• News
• Channel
• FNC
• Hannitys
• America
• new
• show
• President
• Barack
• Obama
• The
• Messiah
• Obamamania
• Great
• One
• Mark
• Levin
• EIB
• wizards
• of
• smart
• NASCAR
• pro
• life
• pro-life
• happy
• liberal
• liberals

[ninjacssss]

Obama is a bad military leader as well... maybe we shoulda elected someone with military expierence before puting them incharge of the #1 military in the world....

[Scootertuner1000]

Just a the GDR (German Democratic Republic) aka East Germany, was not democratic, it was far from it. It was a communist dictatorship and not the least bit democratic. You can say black is white as much as you want, that does not make it so.

[therearenogodsatall]

Who authored the book, "RUSH LIMBAUGH IS A BIG FAT IDIOT!" ? It's an observation that is simply too obvious to ignore. Being that, it certainly can't be held to be a title that is astute or perspicacious as even the most gifted moron could not avoid such notice. However, today one could add a lenthty list of adjectives such as....old, grey, perhaps dottering to the title, but it would still remain the observation that a common fool could make. Rush seems to like eating more than exercise.

[rmccay88]

@ninjacssss

That point is irrelevant though because our puppet Presidents do whatever the central banks, Rothschild's, Rockefeller's, etc. tell them to do. Obama is Bush's 3rd term.

Nick Rockefeller even told Aaron Russo 11 months before 9/11 that we were going to invade Iraq and Afghanistan. Until we get rid of the Federal Reserve, we are going to be stuck with a country on the border line of tyranny that works for the corporate interests, not the American people. We don't mean shit to them.

[Dadutta]

the future of conservatism is tied to the survival of America, which in itself is sketchy....

[thelaughingskeptic]

He thinks he's so smart but barley knows what he's talking about! fox news is less then a joke

[wakeb1444]

@hellya916 Please, tell me what is the 'source' of your Liberty's. We don't even have a conservative party in this country anymore, they've become a bunch of soft fascicts. These two fucking fascicts are two of the greatest fear-mongerers of today, the McCarthys of our time. I don't really support the dem's either. Let's just be honest and admit that we're currently run by the banks and the military. This interview makes me fucking sick.

[BillHicks420]

@libknocker Again, your train of thought is not logic. Like I explained, economics do not equate to mathemathics. My point was, you think with your wallets. I was wrong to point that it wasn`t logic, as it is a matter of personal choice. And so are you.

[BillHicks420]

@libknocker I know what ure on about now. Lol yeah late in deed. First off, I don`t remember my exact train of though, I guess it was that you should people before money and numbers. I don`t know why I claimed it was logic though, as putting the one before the other is not about logic, rather values and personal choice. You`re little rant is wrong. Second of all economics does not equate to maths, just because it contains math. They are two separate fields. What do you mean "WHERE my compas..."?

[BillHicks420]

@libknocker What the fuck you on about? When in this thread have I ever talked to you? 50 questionmarks in a row will not make your feeble attempt to win, any better. True Communism has NEVER been employed. Just like true capitalism "free market" has never been employed. However, variations have. That`s why we have names like Stalinism, Maoism, etc. The "communist" states that have existed has been closer to fascism in practice, as THEY ALL have been totalitarian.

[libknocker]

@BillHicks420 i apologize for beating you about the head with logic i had no idea you where a NOOB!