bonnie prince charlie

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
98,548
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 2, 2007

music video

Category:

Music

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Google this "Republican-rose-and-anti-cath­olic" and judge for yourself the bitter sectarian one-sided rants from the Papist SNP...

  • He was largely unopposed in Scotland because they knew the Stuart line was the true line, a fact distilled by much later Irish migration and idiotic unionist brain washing. It wasn't a Catholic agenda, he was offering religious freedom which most of Scotland definitely didn't have after the land grab that was called the Reformation.

see all

All Comments (765)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • A really nice video

    Thank You

    Love

    Tom

  • @gaconnochie Thanks for this info. I am fascinated by the English, Irish and Scottish history.

  • Independence for Scotland!!

  • @AlbaSiar TOTALLY! It really is shocking how Salmond is getting in on the votes of immigrants. Gordon Wilson was right to have Salmond and his 79 group booted from the SNP, the mistake was letting the clown back in again. The banned 79 group are now half of his ministers! Salmond is betraying Scotland. The SNP have betrayed us all and sold us all out for immigrant votes.

  • @AlbaSiar "With respect, I'm sick of your silly remarks on this board accusing people of being members of organisations without any proof or justification." With respect I never accused anyone of being members of the said organisation. I simply pointed out that the said organisation existed. As to the level of support the SNP at the last Holyrood election attracted 45.4% of the votes cast. Michael Moore's party (secretary of state) attracted only 7.9% of the said vote.

  • @gaconnochie - With respect, I'm sick of your silly remarks on this board accusing people of being members of organisations without any proof or justification. Your leader was kicked of that party for being a far-left extremist. The same extremist is now running that repugnant party now claiming at best 23% of the Scottish voters, and many of them are foreigners. My own view is they are NOT a nationalist party at all - they are in fact a fake anti-Scottish party and should be exposed as such.

  • enter England in the first place. Charles eventually persuaded them to by amongst other things convincing them that the English, especially the English in the north, would flock to his banner. They'd got as far as Derby and had only manged to recruit about 300 or 400 or so. So I suppose they realised there was not going to be a rising in their favour!

  • @oarfrost Och it is one of these we'll never know "what if" situations. Another one is what if they hadn't invaded England? What if he'd been happy to consolidate in Scotland. Supposedly Edinburgh was back in Hanovarian hands by the time the Jacobite Army hit Dalkeith. They only controlled when the army was in situ. That may have changed had they consolidated. As for the retreat I suppose one has to take the councils overall view into account. The Scottish commanders and chiefs had no wish to 

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more