We are currently performing site maintenance. Be cool - we'll be back 100% in a bit.
Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

David Lynch on Product Placement

David Lynch replying to a question about calling product placement in films 'bullsh!t.'  
 
Customize

More From: dlftv

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
Ratings disabled
4,673 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (24)   Options

Loading...
Marked as spam
Speaking of Commercial Whores. How about the way youtube is now putting commercials in videos? Youtube will become just another form of TV, It really sucks. I cut all the logos off my clothes too. Im not a billboard for Nike or anyone else. Yet some people love to walk around with brands all over them. Fools! And if its only David Lynch, Neil Young and Me that care, well at least Im in good company.
Marked as spam
I always notice product placement in a film. For a moment it takes me out of the scene. I think thats what Mr. Lynch has a problem with. It sacrifices something. Most people can handle it fine but it irritates the hell of me. Im one of those guys who always mutes commercials when I watch tv. Some people just talk right over commercials and that makes no sense. Thats what the mute button on the remote is for. The problem with product placement is that I cant mute it during a film. Its Bullshit !!
JacksInn (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
I envy his hair.
standupstella (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Having products in a film is not product placement—if a character like Frank Booth drinks PBR then fine. But Lynch put it in because it was correct, not to get budget support. The point is that with PP you are giving up control of the film to advertisers—Lynch won't do that because he's an artist, unlike Richard Donner. Superman was fine, but it's not a great film. Blue Velvet is.
eddyp60 (1 week ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
eraserhead also
themurvolta (1 month ago)
Comment removed by author
OLTJOE (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
I'll answer you.

There is a difference. The 'product placement' you are referring to in Blue Velvet is an organic one that was not paid for by either Pabst or Heineken. The product placement that he is referring to is a calculated investment by a company (or group of companies) that will portray their product in such a light as to enhance profitability for the company. There was no money changing hands, and, simply put, a cultural backdrop that screams 'Americana'.
OLTJOE (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
This was a response for J20m07
J20M07 (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Good analysis, Thanks.
jkhgsdhgdhgjklsdhfgj (2 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
well, as far as the gucci commercial goes, its a masterpiece, I remember the time i got a glipse of the end, when the lights gos VSSHHHHH and was stunned, and at the same time quite impressed, it takes you places, so even a comercial by david lynch is still a david lynch creation, under that perspective, I find no hypocrisy. You gotta get the money sometimes, but he is, and most people see that right away, a genuine artist, and hes excused in my book at least.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.