Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Intention Experiment part 2 reviewed by Laurie Maves ART

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
182 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 21, 2010

the intention experiment .com talking about time and how we perceive time...linear stuff

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (LaurieMavesART)

  • @ecstatica23 and as for religion...i am a "wholeist" and believe in my heart of hearts my soul, etc that god is entirely too big for one religion, and that people who follow one particular religion, need to for whatever reason they do. once i saw that most religions were truly after the same thing - the same light and energy, that we all are divine, it then makes religion as a one and only choice quite trite. BUT with utmost respect to all religions or to none, we are all physical finding light

  • @ecstatica23 what i think is most incredible is that we tend to think the same way for years and years because we can "See" no other way. and when light is shed upon a different way to be in this physical world, and there are countless ways to exist and co-exist in this amazing physical world we have chosen to live in...a different way to see, we are enlightened, and as frightening as that might be to many, it is liberating as well

  • @ecstatica23 and listen - if you are a skeptic - i can't change that in you - only you can change that and either that way of being in the world works for you or it doesn't always so much. i just asked my 10 yr old how he knows there is love in his heart. can we "prove" that can "science" show us that? he said "no" and i said, "well then how do you know it's there?" and he said he could "feel" it.  what would happen when we all come to trust our feelings more than "what western Science" says?

  • @ecstatica23 well at leat we now have a conversation going.

    listen - this is my view - on the click thing - what you said is what happened and i didnt explain it so well.. but that is what happened - the past was "changed" and you can read more in the book there.

    as for evidence - read the book more than one hundred studies are sited and i'm sure you can take the time to go to each and every one of them - it is a beautiful science as much as i can tell.

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I'd like to answer your question as to why I'm skeptical... well because I haven't seen or read of any evidence, I don't like to believe in things just because people "say so" it's the same "argument" that you get with religion, know what I mean? I ask, where's the evidence. if there are so many "studies" that have proven these things... why haven't the world heard of this, i would think it would be pretty significant.

  • the click thing, doesn't that just sound like really good guessing? it's like if I pick 2 pieces of paper and I draw lines on both of them and then seal it up so no one can see the papers, and then ask a group of people to "intent" more lines one paper, then I look at the papers and see if the results match up? wouldn't it be more impressive if they recorded the results first and THEN did the intetion thing and the original results changed? wouldn't that sound more like changing the past??

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more