Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

9/11 Un-debunked Version 2.0: WTC Collapse

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,471
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (citizenfor911truth1)

  • good video

  • @usd25674

    Thank you for your support.

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (106)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Steel does'nt turn to dust for any reason...

  • @ElJefe3126 In fact, there wasn't much in the video that addressed results that suposedly contridicted the official story. They just atacked the way the tests were done.

    Also, the theory of the controled demolition that the video persented had a major problem. If the entire core on one floor was lost, the collapse would happen imeadiately.

    But why am I telling YOU this? You don't agree woth tuthers either.

  • Major fail here. You know that fire doesn't burn at temperatures of 120 degrees? If you see any open flames whatsoever, then you know that the FLIR readings are wrong, no matter what the scale says.

    Of course NIST, or any reputable scientific investigation, would dismiss those FLIR readings as useless.

    Try again.

  • nice video

  • The official story doesn't prove a thing to me. Just as the conspiracy theory doesnt prove a thing to those who believe the official story. Why have 1600 engineers and architects signed a petition demanding an independent investigation? Thing is this, if it wasnt for the way WTC 7 collapsed i might actually believe the "official story"

  • >old people thinking Rise Against is some sort of death metal screamo band. HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

  • I tried to watch this, but was forced to stop at 00:53. The music is very disturbing.

    Can you please re-make this with a better font a better layed out text and some "normal" background music? .. please?

  • Not one demolition expert in the world says explosives or incendiaries brought down the towers. Not even the Dutch guy who was shown a manipulated video and said WTC 7 was a demo. None say thermite is appropriate for demolition. It's only non-demo experts who make the demo claims. They also make up absurd scenarios in which thermite is used to cause the gradual bowing. What would be the point of such a bizarre approach to controlled demolition?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more