Only hands I see Skawinski raising for value on the river that he wouldn't on the turn are trips, flopped straight, or like once in a blue moon KK. Everything else is a busted flush or straight draw. I like the call.
Thats such a standard call there. Its was a mindless bluff by a player that shouldnt of being calling for what could of been 3 outs (at no point was he getting the price). The reason why its an easy call is because no hand that beats a 7 with a good kicker can flat call 2 streets on that flop apart from the flopped nuts of 65, even then he would 3 bet the turn, if the guy had of flopped the nuts and flat 2 streets he would have to flat the river aswell seen as the board had paired. V easy call!
@Lexington365 the only thing i could infer is that he bet pot size on the river in case his opponent had maybe...pocket 10s pocket Js and would fold OR his opponent had pocket 5's or 6's and *might* pay him off. the call seemed fairly easy, but we aren't sitting there doing it so we don't have much room to talk.
Not really a great call, I mean what are his turn and river bets? Value bets? Bluffs? Pot betting the river makes so sense at all, really looks like he has no clue why he's betting, so I would safely assume he has no clue why he calls the river raise.
Only hands I see Skawinski raising for value on the river that he wouldn't on the turn are trips, flopped straight, or like once in a blue moon KK. Everything else is a busted flush or straight draw. I like the call.
willftalbot 4 months ago
Thats such a standard call there. Its was a mindless bluff by a player that shouldnt of being calling for what could of been 3 outs (at no point was he getting the price). The reason why its an easy call is because no hand that beats a 7 with a good kicker can flat call 2 streets on that flop apart from the flopped nuts of 65, even then he would 3 bet the turn, if the guy had of flopped the nuts and flat 2 streets he would have to flat the river aswell seen as the board had paired. V easy call!
thecrazychef1 11 months ago
@Lexington365 the only thing i could infer is that he bet pot size on the river in case his opponent had maybe...pocket 10s pocket Js and would fold OR his opponent had pocket 5's or 6's and *might* pay him off. the call seemed fairly easy, but we aren't sitting there doing it so we don't have much room to talk.
donmajikjuan 1 year ago
Not really a great call, I mean what are his turn and river bets? Value bets? Bluffs? Pot betting the river makes so sense at all, really looks like he has no clue why he's betting, so I would safely assume he has no clue why he calls the river raise.
Lexington365 1 year ago