Bill Gates Depopulation U.N Agenda 21

Bill Gates says vaccines can help reduce world population
by: Mike Adams, NaturalNews, October 1, 2010

In a recent TED conference presentation, Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates, who has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to new vaccine efforts, speaks on the issue of CO2 emissions and its effects on climate change. He presents a formula for tracking CO2 emissions as follows: CO2 = P x S x E x C.
P = People
S = Services per person
E = Energy per service
C = CO2 per energy unit

Then he adds that in order to get CO2 to zero, "probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero."

Following that, Bill Gates begins to describe how the first number — P (for People) — might be reduced.

He says:
"The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."

Reducing the world population through vaccines
This statement by Bill Gates was not made with any hesitation, stuttering or other indication that it might have been a mistake. It appears to have been a deliberate, calculated part of a well developed and coherent presentation.

So what does it mean when Bill Gates says "if we do a really great job on new vaccines... we could lower [world population] by 10 or 15 percent?"

Clearly, this statement implies that vaccines are a method of population reduction. So is "health care," which all NaturalNews readers already know to be more of a "sick care" system that actually harms more people than it helps.

Perhaps that's the whole point of it. Given that vaccines technology help almost no one from a scientific point of view (http://www.naturalnews.com/029641_v...), it raises the question: For what purpose are vaccines being so heavily pushed in the first place?

Bill Gates seems to be saying that one of the primary purposes is to reduce the global population as a mechanism by which we can reduce CO2 emissions. Once again, watch the video yourself to hear him say it in his own words:
How can vaccines actually be used to reduce world population?
Let's conduct a mental experiment on this issue. If vaccines are to be used to reduce world population, they obviously need to be accepted by the majority of the people. Otherwise the population reduction effort wouldn't be very effective.
And in order for them to be accepted by the majority of the people, they obviously can't just kill people outright. If everybody started dropping dead within 24 hours of receiving the flu shot, the danger of vaccines would become obvious rather quickly and the vaccines would be recalled.
Thus, if vaccines are to be used as an effective population reduction effort, there are really only three ways in which they might theoretically be "effective" from the point of view of those who wish to reduce world population:

#1) They might kill people slowly in a way that's unnoticeable, taking effect over perhaps 10 -- 30 years by accelerating degenerative diseases.

#2) They might reduce fertility and therefore dramatically lower birth rates around the world, thereby reducing the world population over successive generations. This "soft kill" method might seem more acceptable to scientists who want to see the world population fall but don't quite have the stomach to outright kill people with conventional medicine. There is already evidence that vaccines may promote miscarriages (http://www.naturalnews.com/027512_v...).

#3) They might increase the death rate from a future pandemic. Theoretically, widespread vaccination efforts could be followed by a deliberate release of a highly virulent flu strain with a high fatality rate. This "bioweapon" approach could kill millions of people whose immune systems have been weakened by previous vaccine injections.
This is a known side effect of some vaccines, by the way. A study documenting this was published in PLoS. Read the story here: http://www.naturalnews.com/028538_s...


— FAIR USE NOTICE:
These videos may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Bill
• Gates
• Depopulation
• Agenda

[TheTruePhoenixxx]

What a guy. Don't forget to keep an eye on APPLE too. Another giant who's guaranteed to be up to no good.

[BillyBatsonMarvel]

@TheTruePhoenixxx Apple monitors every thing we do via those wonderful iPods & iPads devices.

GOOGLE is another major player in that sandbox as well.

[570PHV5531N]

Owl Gore is going to save us by killing us. Weeeeeee!!

[BillyBatsonMarvel]

@570PHV5531N Weeeeeee!!

[myshambhala]

This is misunderstanding. What Gates said on CNN about vaccines and depopulation:

"...if you reduce childhood deaths, if you improve health in a society, that, surprisingly, population growth goes down. ...And there's a miracle intervention, which is vaccines. In 1960, over 20 million children died. In 2005, less than 10 million died. And that's despite much larger global population. That is huge progress."

For full interview Google:

Bill Gates Interview; Third World Development; CNN

[vinny111]

they also killing people with HIV drugs? the HIV virus is fake, in the real scientific documents its never been isolated and its Fraud,but the media do not tell the population coz the media is ran by goverment and the So called HIV virus is a money making scam run by government and gallo they are all down their with Hitler, the whole HIV/AIDS is a Fraud an i hear bill gate is involved in this also,The wold need to be told thank GOD for the Internet!

[luc59457]

btw I'm not sticking for Bill Gates, there's a lot of things I would tell him if I could!

[luc59457]

@BillyBatsonMarvel The problem with going green is like anything on the market, it's too broadly accepted. Too much crap! It's really the markets that have to have in all aspects to only accept the best varieties of products, and do away with nearly 50% of the crap being manufactured. This would then present a dilemma that would have to be addressed prior. Transitioning all these people loosing their jobs to better ones. Most Styrofoam manufacturers, is one example of what must go in the future

[luc59457]

What is better than petroleum IC engines has existed just as long. It needs crude also. But the point is not to reach 0, it is the significant reduction which we are capable of. The amounts we emit now is unnecessary to what we are capable of. The efficiency we have now, is unnecessary to what we are capable of, and everyone knows, electric with complimentary power plants are definitely more efficient than gas. And batteries are improving which was the problem of the past.

[luc59457]

@BillyBatsonMarvel Stating, saving the planet, is vague, unclear.. Save it from what? Falling apart? Going green is about more than reducing pollution (particularly in dense urban areas) which effects air quality and reduces potential smog advisories. It also can reduce the cost to travel, the maintenance of parts (because there are less and smaller) and it also makes our economies work more efficiently, because we have better than 20% give or take, petroleum, plus transporting it!

[BillyBatsonMarvel]

@luc59457 We can live as one with OUR mother planet. They create products for profit and (surveillance) enslavement. I can't see any reason why water,air and electricity are not our primarily source of fuel. This whole going green crap has NOTHING to do with saving the planet, it's a Builderberg Group's Globalistic Agenda 21 power grab scheme. Modern day "Games of Thrones". The great George Carlin addressed "our impact" issue the best. watch?v=eScDfYzMEEw