White Noise, Moon Hoax Pt. 3 -- Blast Craters

This rocket, popularly referred to by moon hoax believers needs a good debunking. Kaysing's claim that there should be LARGE blast craters made by the lunar landers was as stupid when he made it as it is now. But like religious fundamentalists who still believe God covered the whole earth with water, killing everything except a boatload of people and animals, modern CTs canonize the words of the conspiracy founders and preach them with the zeal and confidence of Fred Phelps and Ron Hubbard. And like Noahic Flood believers, they're embarrassingly wrong.

Also, I display the screen clips for all my signature "Yes, we did" statements as well as the joke pictures, many of which I have hidden in my videos.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• moon
• landing
• hoax
• Apollo
• NASA
• fake
• rocket
• blast
• crater
• conspiracy

[DjinnGuru]

lol, did Jarrah actually call the moon's surface "soil"? As far as I know, it's the part of the earth's surface consisting of humus and disintegrated rock. Does the moon have humus?

[Astrobrant2]

@DjinnGuru "Soil" has become an acceptable term for it. I guess we'll just have to expand our definition!

[TheTruemouse]

Actually the whole subject of the landing rockets disturbing the moon-dust is null and void. They didn't need to use rockets to soften the landing when gliding in on 1/6th Earth's gravity and those four huge things, one on each corner of the lander are shock-absorbers. Easily big enough to take care of a soft touch-down without the use of descent control thrusters.

Stop using what you learned in high-school physics outside high-school.

[Astrobrant2]

@TheTruemouse Well, they did need to use the rocket thruster to slow down their descent. It was a constant deceleration. Once they got to about 5 or 6 feet above the surface, if they were going only one or two feet per second, they could cut off the thrusters and drop from there. That much impact was within safe range, but they wouldn't want to do it from much higher than that.

[TheTruemouse]

@Astrobrant2 Point is they wouldn't have had the concentrated blast from the comic-book landing the hoax-squad seem to believe they would make, and certainly it wouldn't need the force they describe.

It just seems to me that folks forget this was the 'lunar landing module' it was designed to land on the moon. It wasn't called the 'hovering in the backlot of a poorly budgeted special effects company module'.

The clue is in the name.

[Astrobrant2]

@TheTruemouse No argument there.

In addition, the exhaust bell covered a very large area which spreads that force out a lot, thus minimizing the pressure on the ground. Add to that the fact that in a vacuum, that exhaust comes out at very wide angle.

I think Kaysing was the first to come up with this crater nonsense. I'm hoping hoax nuts will learn just how ignorant he was, in addition to confessing that he concocted this hoax nonsense at the request of an anti-American heroin addict.

[markjh2005]

Be careful Astrobrant- Jarrah might start complaining that you didn't use Gaddy's pi in your equations ;-)

[ytmoog]

There is a better video of the Armadillo here

watch?v=rsVbl34HIws

Of course the fragments of concrete were caused by the heat not the pressure.

The heat evaporates the water in the concrete causing it to expand breaking of fragments. It is a well understood effect.

[mattmopar440]

Thank you for posting I hope people learn math is the way to prove we went to the moon not just little clips and pictures that are copies of copies

Thanks Matt

[johnsenkenn]

@Astrobrant2

If you spread out the thrust, you spread out the force, and when you spread out the force you need more thrust. Is that according to science, of course there is always the possibility to askascience.

[Astrobrant2]

I e-mailed Rocketdyne some months ago, but didn't get a reply. I'll try again.

It looks like you got the information I was looking for, but I'd still like to have more detail. I want a letter from Rocketdyne explaining all of this so I can post it as a reply to Jarrah's triumphant video where he posts the letter listing Kaysing's euphemistic credentials.

One television documentary did label Rene as a physicist. He later admitted that he had no such degree.

[Astrobrant2]

Maybe from Patriot "University," where Kent Hovind got his.