17a. Cost Minimization, Production and Lagrangians

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
29,366
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 19, 2009

In this video, I demonstrate a mathematical method for deriving a firm's cost function from a production function. I do so by example, using the example of a constant returns to scale Cobb-Douglas production function. This video assumes familiarity with calculus. If you are unfamiliar with calculus, Lecture 17 has all of the graphical intuition that is in this video.

In the process, I demonstrate how to use the method of Lagrange multipliers. My use of the Lagrangian is operational. That is, I refrain from giving all of the technical theoretical details that justify using a Lagrangian method. In this video, I merely demonstrate how to use it to solve an expenditure minimization problem.

For a list of videos and links to all of the microeconomics videos on this channel (organized by topic), check out the Intromediate Microeconomics video web page:

http://blog.thisyoungeconomist.com/p/learn-microeconomics.html

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (intromediateecon)

  • I've just watched a few vides and as a fellow university economics teacher, I think you're doing an amazing job. Keep up the good work!

  • @aewaterloo Thanks!

  • quick question, why is l/k^1-alpha/k/l^alpha equal to L/K

  • (L/K)^(1-alpha) / (K/L)^(alpha)

    equals [by inverting and multiplying]

    (L/K)^(1-alpha) * (L/K)^(alpha)

    Then, you just add the exponents, when you multiply this out:

    (L/K)^(1-alpha+alpha)

    That equals L/K

  • Thanks for the vid! Cleared some things up.

    This would be exacly the same thing for a private consumers expenditure function right? But instead of C(Pl, Pk, Q0), the function would be called E(U, P1, P2) ?

    And just think of the isokost as a budgetconstraint, and the isquant as a utilize "happyness" (or whatever it measures) ? :)

    Regards,

  • That's correct! Thanks for the comment.

see all

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Man you make it so intuitive and easy to understand!!! Good work! Like it

  • Don't know if you're still checking these comments but I have a question!

    Would you ever consider doing the Homogenous Production Functions of Perfect Substitutes and Perfect Compliments? Cobb Douglas is easy enough to grab but I'm challenged too much when trying to describe Perfect Subs and Comps..

    Thank you for the other videos! You're far clearer than my current lecturer!!

  • I would recommend (highly) that you state the production function in terms of A*K^(lambda)*L(1-lambda). This represents the TFP constant, which must be divided into Q0, the output level, to properly solve the optimal levels K*,L*.

  • This is a really good explanation, thanx! though it would be good to have a numerical example at the end :)

  • neo classical - chicago

  • Thanks. This helped a lot on my Math Econ homework.

  • if i was given a certain budget, would i work from the cost function to find the quantity and then the optimal levels of K and L?

  • the cobb-douglas functions are DEAD and have NO applicance is real economics. sorry

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more