Webster Tarpley on Wood & Reynolds Qui Tam

This was filmed in Bradford in 2007.

A shame he had not studied the evidence ...

http://tinyurl.com/911qtam http://tinyurl.com/911ftb
http://www.checktheevidence.com/

Here is what Webster Tarpley said:
============
I believe that research should be carried out -- you cannot ban any research a priori. I've always argued for a research sphere separated from a political sphere -- and what I think of as the political sphere is what we've seen [in his presentation] it has to with for example using 9/11 and the Rogue B52 to get impeachment going -- because without 9/11 truth, you cannot defeat Bush politically. So I am always in favour of a political sphere which is separate from a research sphere. For a lot of people in the United States, the research sphere is all there is...

What do you think of the Directed Energy Weapons scenario?

Hang on I am getting to it, but the political sphere for me is indispensable. Now, I would never say I won't co-operate with someone because they have a theoretical difference from me. I don't think it's possible to talk about "men from mars". I don't recommend blaming it on the action of the holy spirit -- much as I like the Holy Spirit -but short of this, I would not have any preclusion. Concerning her theory, I think her theory is something she has failed to prove. I don't see her successfully proving the "beam" theory and I like Fetzer very much and I try to co-operate with Fetzer on political matters, but I have not been convinced by the Space Laser or Beam Weapons or new Physical Principles argument. So, I think it's fine for them to continue with this but you have to realise that this is an unproven hypothesis. I think it is not wise if they get a chance to be on television to make that the leading edge. I would not do that....

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• 911
• Qui
• Tam
• Inside
• Job
• Judy
• Wood
• Morgan
• Reynolds
• Court
• Case
• Evidence
• Ridicule
• Webster
• Tarpley

[freedomleft]

so the point is tarpley specializes in the political,not the technical.this is also 4 yrs old. tarpley and wood both seem genuine to me,just working the 911 isssue from different eyes.

[checktheevidence]

@freedomleft Err - so why doesn't/didn't Tarpley back the court case? If it had gone forward, those accused would've had to go under oath.

[914light]

I can only HOPE Tarpley WOULD answer differently today !! it looks like back in 07 he was lumping Dr. Wood in with the a/e911 gang...I can only have faith Dr. Woods evidence has educated him to date. He needs to be asked this again ..before I slam him ....: )

[checktheevidence]

@914light So why don't you ask him?

[checktheevidence]

@comedytracker Why comment? Why bother to any research? Doesn't matter - it was too long ago anyway... bla bla - no positive contribution - just more wasted bytes.

***OR*** Google Dr Judy Wood Qui Tam

***OR*** Google Hurricane Erin and i911

***OR*** Google 9/11 and the Hutchison effect

Much more useful than leaving utterly pointless comments.

[checktheevidence]

@comedytracker Oops - what you mean is "I don't care" which is fine - it's your loss. I know lots of people who care, thanks. Probably a good thing that you're not one of them - as you wouldn't get along. Probably too busy "tracking comedy" rather than looking for the truth

[1famekouby]

Pretty pathetic to see so many useful idiots defending the space laser beams "theory".

If you really think for a single minute that a new 9/11 investigation will come thanks to an unproven "theory" who's principle defendant (Wood) only sees fit to explain with a picture book, you're madly delusional. Get off the 9/11 bandwagon and go back to reading sci-fi and hoping to get beamed up.

The only hard evidence is what Tarpley is pointing to.

[project3ss]

WT's concern is to stop WW3.

1. Dust can be seen streaming off the falling steel like a choo choo train (new dust is clearly being generated as it falls)

2. No known mechanism (thermite, gravity etc) can account for this.

3. (Along with the other evidence) that leaves some kind of directed free energy tech

4. Therefore someone, somewhere has this tech which could usher in a new era for humanity

5. Therefore what on earth are we doing fighting each other over 20C resources & technology?

Done :)

[WAHsu]

@comedytracker

I disagree. Wake up please.

DEWs have been around for a long time now.

@checktheevidence The guy in the video is typical. He wants Judy Wood to prove the technology and source behind it. Well that is fine and dandy, but what about their parade? ae911 just wants an investigation, isn't that what WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO starting? Unofficially of course.

Thanks for the video upload!

[checktheevidence]

@comedytracker I think the real question is "Do you think anyone will take you seriously with a stupid posting name and Avatar of a cartoon character"? Secondly "who is" us?

Congrats on making no useful contribution to this posting - except to identify the characteristics of those who don't want the truth to be known about the cover up of 911 -and those who are involved in it.

[comedytracker]

@checktheevidence I think the real question is do you work with or against us. Clearly you work against us.