9/11 The New Hiroshima 1/10

This is Dr. Judy Wood speech on 9/11 and the directed energy weapons,
organized by Jim Fetzer on the weekend of Aug 3rd-5th, 2007.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• directed
• energy
• weapons
• DEW
• WTC
• 9/11
• no
• plane
• theory

[tropophyte]

I will sum all 10 of these Judy Wood videos right here, so you don't have to spend 4 hours processing it all.

The gist of it all:

1. Judy claims the US government created a new weapon that disrupts the molecular basis of matter. Meaning things disintegrate (ie Molecular

[tropophyte]

1. Disassociation).

2. She claims the WTC was turned to dust by the weapon.

1. Proof 1: 24' Cylinder holes that go down 60 feet and are not filled with debris from the collapsed towers.

2. Proof 2:  Claims 9.22 seconds is free fall speed, and the ground rumbled for 8 seconds. Therefore the collapse happened faster than free fall.

[tropophyte]

3. Proof 3: Claims a seismograph measures 2.4 magnitude earthquake in January 2001, and that the two towers collapsing according to USGS charts was less than a 2.4 (relative to a quarry blast).

1. She believes the 500,000 tons of debris would have shook more.

2. She claims wtc 7 was a 0.6 on the Richter magnitude scale which is equivalent to a jack hammer.

3. She is not suggesting tampered reports, she is suggesting this is proof the

[tropophyte]

buildings were turned to dust and blew away in the wind, and just disintegrated from the weapon. Disappearing.

4. Proof 4: Shows photo's which indicate the concrete and bedrock foundation of the wtc were not busted...proof of disintegration (no heavy impact).

1. Claims the cleanup cranes broke it later, but the wtc could not. Also mentions the wtc path trains were recovered in January 2002 mainly unscathed...light impact.

[tropophyte]

5. Proof 5: Indicates “wheat checks” (outer column groups) turned to dust, but aluminum did not.

1. Indicates that World Financial Center one, the facade around the doorway was affected equally. All and only windows were blown out.

1. Shows photos showing that DIRT was placed down, cleaned away, the new dirt driven in and dumped on the ground again.

2. Dirt is one of the ways of treating contaminated areas, and it was used in Chernobyl nuclear disaster.

[tropophyte]

3. Wood says debunker's say there is not enough energy to power such a weapon.

1. Cites St. Helen's eruption and nuclear bomb blasts indicate massive energy output.

2. Compares this to dust cloud at wtc.

1. She shows how the top part which fell off crooked disintegrated before hitting the ground at floor 78.

1. Disintegration is her theme here and suggests it is evidence of the weapon.

[tropophyte]

2. Claims the spire which was free standing 60 stories high inner column, both strong and rigid, went straight down and turned to dust, indicating disintegration.

3. Claims once the wtc dust cleared, and the blue sky appeared, she could see people walking through the dust, and seemed to be kicking it up.

1. She claims it was rising up on it's own and not being kicked, because it was disintegrating into thin air. She shows a slide that claims to be rising up without people kicking it.

[tropophyte]

4. She comments the dust cloud blowing toward Brooklyn that day. The USGS tests of the dust did not test this 'special' dust from this particular area showing the disintegration.

5. She points out street cleaners cleaning up the dust, cites this as suspicious activity, and believes they are cleaning up the evidence of these disintegrating materials, and the fuming.

6. She explains that DIRT (potting soil) was brought in by the truck load.

[tropophyte]

1. Sees photos with dirt all over which was brought in.

1. Inside cab of a firetruck. (which was missing and engine block).

2. A line of firemen passing a bucket down the line standing on DIRT.

3. Rudy Giuliani video claims they moved 120 dump trucks full of debris out.

1. Wood sees this as a cover story, and that new dirt was really being brought into the site.

[tropophyte]

2. Shows picture of a dump truck driving in a load of wet dirt.

4. Woods spends a lot of time discussing the nature of the dust clouds and explains how Satellite images show the cloud rising into the atmosphere, and shooting upward, which is distinct from the low level dust clouds of a traditional demolition.

1. She also compares how traditional demolition dust settled quickly in 20 minutes, where wtc many days.