Evidence of Very Suspicious Activities at the World Trade Center Before 9/11
Uploader Comments (Cincinnati911Truth)
Top Comments
-
Google it yourself. You're delusional if you really think 19 Islamic hijackers with boxcutters could outwit our multi-billion dollar intelligence and military industry. And crash two planes into the World Trade Center twin towers and the cause three buildings to completely collapse due to fire for the first time in engineering history.
Google:
Architects and Engineers For 9/11 Truth
Patriots Question 9/11
Scholars For 9/11 Truth and Justice
Pilots For 9/11 Truth
Firefighters For 9/11 Truth
-
Two jet planes were filmed from various angles striking the Twin Towers. Multiple signs of controlled demolition were seen and heard bringing down WTC 1, 2 and 7. The military grade explosive/incendiary nanothermite was tested and found in all WTC dust samples. Pools of molten metal were seen by many eyewitnesses flowing through the basements of WTC 1, 2 and 7. And where the hell was our air defense (NORAD) on the morning of 9/11?
Video Responses
All Comments (403)
-
To rely on "Scientists & Experts" for solid facts?. I am a scientist and I am an expert. I can sign my name to any number of reports, research data and independant investigations. I'm a great public speaker with humatic charm and graceful humour. I admit I have penned my signature because the brief flick of the wrist and resulting ink splash made me rich. When you squabble over justice and righteousness you will be hens pecking in the dirt.
-
@MisterMcKinney Conspiracy believers will say that freefall speeds signify that there is no internal resistance to the collapse signifying that explosives were used to compromise the internal support structure of a building. The problem with their theory is that the "Freefall" myth of WTC 1,2, and 7 is exactly that a myth. Freefall from the top of the twin towers would be 9.8 seconds, from wtc 7, 5.956 seconds. WTC 1 and 2 fell at 18 to 23 seconds and wtc7 18 seconds.
-
Research my brother and free your mind from the conspiracy flock of junk science, and outright lies.
-
@Cincinnati911Truth Did you not read me earlier post? The "Freefall" myth is exactly that a MYTH. The acceleration of gravity is g = -9.81 m/s^2. Free fall speed from the top of the WTC would be 9.8 seconds. They fell in 18 and 23 seconds respectively, Freefall from the top of WTC 7 would be 5.956, yet if you time it from when the penthouses collapsed into the roof, WTC7's collapse time is 18 seconds. Once again NO WHERE NEAR free fall speed.
-
@Cincinnati911Truth Not to interject rudely, but also, the wtc 1 and 2 were like three separate buildings in one. They each had three integral reinforcing sections in them. That would give them more resistance to divert the direction path of the collapsing upper halves of these buildings.
-
@MisterMcKinney What?! Maybe the resistance would change the direction of the collapse. And even if it did fall straight down, their would be more than dust on the ground.
Can someone explain to me about the significance of a building collapsing a free-fall speed? How else is a building supposed to fall?
MisterMcKinney 3 days ago
@MisterMcKinney
If an object falls at freefall acceleration that means there is no resistance beneath that object and the ground. The object is basically falling through air to the ground. But a building is what is known as a "redundant structure" because each floor of a building is constructed with vertical support columns, lateral girders and trusses as well as all the bolts or welds to hold each, column, girder, truss in place. There a lot of structural resistance there.
Cincinnati911Truth 3 days ago
@MisterMcKinney
Continued from below... Since World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 and 7 all fell so quickly (almost at freefall acceleration (or almost like falling through just air)) that means that those supporting columns, girders, trusses were all being removed by explosives (controlled demolition) in order to make that happen. Even NIST had to admit that WTC 7 fell at freefall speed for 2.25 seconds. This isn't possible without explosives removing that resistance first.
Cincinnati911Truth 3 days ago
This guy in the video is an idiot, he spouts off a bunch of crap as if it is fact!
CRAZYHORSE19682003 6 days ago
@CRAZYHORSE19682003
Go to Google Video or YouTube and watch a documentary film called "9/11:Blueprint For Truth".
Cincinnati911Truth 6 days ago
The evidences are real but there will not be anybody who gives a full confession. That's the point. The plausible deniability and the scape goats. That's why the truthers have impossible job to do. There will nothing more but useless 'evidence exhibitions' and everlasting debate, Truthers vs Debunkers. Has been already over 10 years and still going on. But still we all hope the real truth will be revealed. I do hope it happens. What happens then, I can't even imagine.
Scumbot404 1 week ago
@Scumbot404
In April 2009 nine scientists from three countries published a peer reviewed scientific paper entitled "Active Thermetic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" demonstrating that a nanothermitic explosive was found in all WTC dust samples tested. But yes, getting this info acknowledged and finding those who did it can only be achieved by a new "independent" 9/11 investigation and none of our world leaders have the courage to do it!
Cincinnati911Truth 1 week ago 2