Visible Proof That Oswald Was Innocent

ATTENTION: Part 2 can be found at the link below:
http://youtu.be/CRW2mkXDCaw
In poker, you have to calculate the odds of a guy drawing a certain card. For instance, the odds of drawing an inside straight are 1 in 13. So, let's size up the odds in this case.

The fact that both Oswald and Doorman look generally alike and are both wearing a loose-fitting outer shirt, that is unbuttoned, over a white t-shirt with a v-neck, creates, in itself, a strong likelihood that they are the same person.

Take the one issue of both shirts being unbuttoned. What percentage of men at work in the city go around with their shirt largely unbuttoned? Percentage-wise, it has got to be small. I don't know what it is exactly, but you'd have to agree that it could be no greater than 1 in 10. Right? If you don't agree, then walk down the street in downtown Dallas, Texas or any other big city and start observing men, and keep track of how many are buttoned vs unbuttoned, and come up with your own number. Take a representative sample. I think 1 in 10 is actually too big, but we'll go with it. The simple fact is that: MOST MEN BUTTON UP.

Now, there's no doubt that Oswald was unbuttoned- he was unbuttoned when he was arrested. Plus, we know that his buttons were missing, so he had to be unbuttoned. But nobody reported Lovelady being unbuttoned, and in the one picture we have of him from that day, he was NOT unbuttoned.

Mathematically speaking, that one variable, by itself, creates strong odds that Doorman was Oswald and not Lovelady.

But then, you keep going. Both Oswald's and Doorman's shirts were loose-fitting, somewhat over-sized. The simple fact is that Oswald was thin and scrawny, and he didn't fill out his shirts too well, and you see the same thing in Doorman, whose shirt was billowing. Lovelady was a burly guy, in comparison, weighing 40 pounds more than Oswald. And that's why Lovelady's shirts fit snugly.

I put the odds of Oswald and Doorman both wearing loose-fitting shirts at 1 in 3. Again, it probably should be lower, but we'll go with that. But, when you are talking about two variables, they have to be multiplied together. So, we are now talking about a 1 in 30 chance that both Doorman and Oswald would be wearing shirts that were both unbuttoned and loose-fitting. (10 x 3 = 30)

Then there is the v-neck t-shirt. Round-neck t-shirts, also called crew-neck, have always been more popular and still are, but v-neck users are gaining. Recent industry reports show that 67% of t-shirt sales have been crew-neck. Then came sleeveless tanks at 17%, and then v-necks at 16%. That last figure was probably much lower in 1963, but let's go with it. So, we'll say 1 in 6 odds of both wearing v-neck t-shirts. Multiplying that out, we are now at 1 in 180 (30 x 6).

Note that some have argued that Oswald's t-shirt was really a regular t-shirt that got deformed because he pulled on it. But if so, it doesn't matter because it's still a likeness between the two of them. And, how likely is it that Oswald and Lovelady had the same quirk? Note also that in every picture we have of Lovelady, he is wearing a perfect, undeformed, crew-neck t-shirt.

So, we are left with odds of 180 to 1 against the likelihood that both Oswald and Doorway Man wore unbuttoned, loose-fitting, long-sleeved outer shirts over v-neck t-shirts. But then, when we factor in the matching collars and lapels, it takes it off the chart. The odds of that are too small to calculate. They are infinitesmal. The right collars of Oswald and Doorman match PERFECTLY, as I demonstrate in my videos. And although we cannot see the left collar of Doorman, (because they covered it up with that phony, ridiculous Black Tie Man) we can see the long left lapel on Doorman, which matches the one on Oswald. Again, that puts it off the chart. How many shirts even have lapels?

Note that all this would be true even if Doorman could be ANYBODY. It would be true even Doorman could be a random guy who just happened to be walking by and stopped. But, in this case, it's not that Doorman could be just anybody. If he's not Oswald, then he can only be one other person on the face of the Earth: Billy Lovelady. We would have to assume that one particular individual just happened to dress himself and arrange himself that day in the exact same manner as Lee Harvey Oswald.

Mathematically speaking, the odds that Oswald and Doorman are the same person are extremely great. And if you don't think so, I sure wish you would sit down and play some poker with me. And let's make it high stakes.

The Doorman was Oswald, and the likenesses to Lovelady, such as the hairline and the shirt pattern, were FAKED. I'd go all-in on that bet.

A 48 year old state lie is dying. Let's put it out of its misery.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• JFK
• JFK Assassination
• Oswald
• Lee Harvey Oswald
• Altgens Photo
• Billy Lovelady
• Conspiracy theories
• President John Kennedy
• President Kennedy

[fallspeed]

@Firsk Yes, it did. It was published at 1:03pm to be precise - it went out all over the world. You can also search in Google Images for the contact sheet of the photo, which clearly shows it wasn't altered. Even if they had Hollywood experts on hand, they couldn't have developed and altered this photo in less than 30 minutes.

[Firsk]

@fallspeed There were several Altgens photos, and this one did NOT get out that fast. Besides, the existence of the anomalies is proof-positive that they found the time to do them. The anomalies, irregularities, and weird "composites" in this vast Altgens photo all occur in that little area around Doorman and nowhere else. There is simply no denying that the photo was altered. And of course, that is true of much of the evidence in the JFK case. The Doorman was Oswald; he was watching. No doubt. 

[fallspeed]

@Firsk I think Oswald was a patsy, but when could the Altgens photo have been altered? The photographer ran to the local news office a few minutes after the assassination and it was out on the AP wires at 1pm, less than a half hour later. There wasn't time, assuming that anybody even knew what Doorway Man was supposed to look like.

[BarryBazzaRyder]

Oswald an innocent man.

[Firsk]

@jacobji5 I have seen Dr. David Mantik's presentation on the phony autopsy x-rays, and he is a board-certified radiologist. There is so much phony evidence in the JFK case that it makes your head swim. That's why I don't get it that anyone would have difficulty accepting that the Altgens photo was altered. With so much other altered evidence, why not that too?

[jacobji5]

@Firsk web page: morningstar 3-2 htm

When you see the 4 pics under Jaw Comparison, never mind that. Look at the sideburns. Then look again at the color death pic. And remember JFK had brown hair, not black. Furthermore, Tippit damaged his ear when falling on the street on the side of his head.

As for the X-Ray skull, you see a "hook or clasp" on it. The assholes tried to fool us using a Medical Training Skull. You can create damages to suit your needs, with a Med Skull. So obvious now.

[Firsk]

@jacobji5 I don't claim to know about the auotpsy photos, but I will run it by Dr. Fetzer. But, thank you for acknowledging that Oswald was the Doorway Man. I would bet my life on it. And I'm not just saying that; I really would. Somebody sent me another picture of Lovelady from Dallas PD, and I made yet another collage with Doorman. Lovelady's arm is like 3x as thick. Lovelady was like the Incredible Hulk compared to Doorman. There is no way they could haev been the same person.

[jacobji5]

@Firsk Yes it is Oswald in the doorway. Now see if you can get Fetzer to see that the JFK autopsy photos are really JD Tippit. The DPD friends of Tippit did nickname him Jack & Kennedy, for the obvious reason. Tippit was SCHEDULED to die immediately after JFK.

Need to show a body to match the conspiracy story and altered film? You got it. The proof is in the sideburns on both men. And Kennedy did not have black hair; Tippit did. The black haired JFK pics are to keep you programmed stupid.

[Firsk]

A new article by Dr. James Fetzer and myself was published today by Veterans Today: Military and Foreign Affairs Journal. The title of the article is: JFK Special: Oswald was in the Doorway, after all! I can't post the link but if you go to veteranstoday website you'll find it.

Dr. Fetzer and I feel that history was made today, that is, real history was uncovered. This may be the biggest breakthrough in the JFK assassination to come along in years, perhaps decades. Please tell others.

[6969clitlicker]

thats so very true