Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

I'm against this sort of thing

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,083
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 27, 2007

Clips from the documentary "Taking Liberties since 1997", about the loss of freedoms in the UK under New Labour.

Even though we have another layer of protection here in the states, it's somehow worse here...

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Darganot)

  • A wealth of criticisms, without any alternative for defending the people against an extremist network like Fundamentalist Islamic Terrorism that HIDES AMONG OUR CITIZENS & plans our death. How can we protect ourselves without intelligence on people living in our country? What alternative way can you propose for gathering intelligence to prevent another handful of people from easily killing 3000 casualties? When you criticize one policy, offer an alternative. Otherwise what's the point?

  • I have many, many other videos whitch offer many solutions, but not a disriminatory one that you seek. You wish to oppress others out of fear and paranoia without any regard to the facts or the circumstances.  If the U.S. would stop trying to police and control the world, the people in it wouldn't try to "plans our death".

    How would you feel if say, China, had a few dozen military bases in the US?

see all

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You have no such right. You will leave and lose some kudos in the process, which you deserve. Or you can accept my opinions about you calling me a tool and violent raving on the street in the name of political justice.

  • I dont want power. I want power to leave me the fuc alone. I want you to leave this argument now.

  • That is selfish and hegemonic denial of other people's wishes. You can't have power with those kinds of views.

  • This is an endless argument. Thus, I will disprove the last sentence by ending it now.

  • Yet all the violent revolutions have failed to end class stratification and political hegemony.

  • Thank you for assuming my age. Incedentally, i am legally an adult. I also only advocate violence to protect from violence, with peace as the thing to work twords, as did Malcom X. I said nothing of orthodoxy, only stating the fact of nonviolent revolution as yet being nonexistent.

  • Listen kid, not all effects are violent. If my speech influences other people so as much as that they change their behavior, then it is powerful enough. And if I can make political change, then it is revolutionary. It is just naive to ramble on about one orthodox way of doing revolution by force on the street. People make politics, violence does not make anything but violent people and angry victims.

  • which they are not. There is no such thing as a peacefull revolution. Even Gandhi had the benefit of a violent revolutionary group, to which he was the establishment's choice alternative.

  • Not if my arguments are revolutionary.

  • teemuruskeepaa, youre a tool.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more