Liquid Mix - strange frequencies responses
Uploader Comments (Dokdude)
All Comments (10)
-
@Dokdude thx a lot man
-
@Dokdude thank you so much for the reply!
very unfortunate the behavior of eq as I love this particular unit.
-
@WirSindRocker Yes, now it's finally possible to store and recall preset from the gui. But the behaviour in the Low Frequency zone is really weird. LM is definitely not suited for low cuts. I think is more suited for "making a sound" than surgical removing. BTW compressors are really good.
-
@Dokdude yes, but i was wondering about the new GUI.
Didn´t notice there is Version 3 now.
Downloaded it, and it fixed some bugs for me.
These responses look really strange..
I hate the lowshelfs/lowcuts on the liquidmixes -.-
-
@WirSindRocker LM32, but it doesn't matter if 16 or 32. It depends on emulations, not on how many channels.
-
Liquid Mix 16 or 32?
absolutely wonderful song...
really wonderful..
i loop it for an hour...
daxweb 4 months ago
@daxweb Thank you so much :) Updated video details with the link where you can find and download the tracks, this is #10. Bye.
Dokdude 3 months ago
bad for low cuts is right apparently. they say this is a direct result of the dynamic convolution process itself. focusrite mentions this in the faq section of liquid mix 3.0
by saying trusted emulations, you mean these emulations don't get all wonky under 160hz?
slackmode83 1 year ago
@slackmode83 Well, i mean that emulations are seameless and consistent in every setting. In LMix EVERY low cut, begin to cut a 500Hz, but in trusted emulation there are no "surprises", no strange behaviuors (like the one at 1:04 in video). BTW, most of the time what you see on the graph of LM is not what you get, and doens't exist a steep cut filter ad 160. Boost, instead, is very good. Pultec emulations are really really good.
My suggestion: for low cut use always a different plugin.
Dokdude 1 year ago