9/11 - Something "fishy" about the South Tower collapse
Top Comments
All Comments (354)
-
@5cbb9 i love how anyone who disagrees with people who think critically about the most important event of the early 21st century need only name-call and make disparaging insults to gain instant crediblility,....
-
i love how everyone with a conspiracy theory is automatically a structural engineer...
-
@YourInvestmentAdvise NO we are not in outer space. You have made a very important and insightful and truthful statement. Thank you! Seriously. I have no problem adjusting my opinions or course, I am asking questions. No matter what site you visit, there is confusion pain, etc etc about 9/11. I am glad we can still discuss this on Youtube. We need to take it higher. My position is, simply that. It does not all add up. Something is amiss. Victims are still passing away. :(
-
@frankbateau1 Steel was not reduced to powder. LOL. Anyone who says is was is just plain off in another universe. Some 185,101 tons of structural steel were hauled away from ground zero. The bulk of the steel was shipped to China and India. The Chinese firm Baosteel purchased 50,000 tons at a rate of $120 per ton.
-
@YourInvestmentAdvise One other thing, ther are photos and videoes showing some upright beams clearly cut at straight angles. Nuff said.
-
@YourInvestmentAdvise I hear you.
I hear you. I mentioned the cement. This does not explain the disintegreation of solid steel. Drop a large 4 inch thick x 30 foot long steel beam from 1000 feet and see if it reduces to it's primal elements. Please re-read my comment. The floors were not just big slabs of concrete. In huge rockfalls, the rocks do not completly reduce to powder, they break into various sizes, some sand may form, but baby powder? The trays? Nahh..
-
@frankbateau1 What causes disintegration of rocks when huge chucks break off and fall in Yosemite? When things fall from great heights they break apart and get pulverized. It's called kinetic energy. Google it. Anyone who can't see the simple cause and effect of the planes causing these towers to fall needs to stop watching Hollywood movies.
-
@BladeJones Don't forget, the charges were throughout the entire buildings, fired below and above impact zones. What caused the utter disintegration of the tops of the towers, especially the south tower? Where were the platforms (steel and cement) of the floors? Cement breaking down is one thing, but the "trays" that it was poured into were steel. How did they turn to powder? I saw and touched this residue myself. The cross support beams? All of them? Nahh...
-
Hence why people hate Obama more than ever now that he announced that the troops are coming back home, maybe because he has balls to say "Enough" to a waste of money and lives and lies in these wars.
-
was the song?... gold bless thoses people on 9\11
@breadsped98 the initial collapse of WTC 2 progresses as fast as falling debris, how is that possible?, did the intact portion have the resistance of air?
fillyferz 5 months ago 5
So sick of hearing about the towers 'pancaking'. What building has ever done that? It's not a real thing, it's just put out there as an ironclad theory that automatically has credit. If there was 'pancaking' you would see visual resistance and the collapse would slowwww down. It would not accelerate. Also, the top on both towers lean in the beginning, meaning only one side was collapsing, why would the other side suddenly push down with equal force and 'pancake' the floors? Preposterous.
edyken77 2 months ago 2