plate techtonics

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
421,712
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 30, 2006

plate techtonics

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 23 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • I wasted 1 hours of my life in Geography learning this when I could of just stayed at home and watched this 1 and a half minute video... Oh well, It at least helped me with my homework :3

  • @PointlessSteel And the only evidence they found was that the Sun moved across the sky, thus it circled Earth! When in reality steel isn't pointless.

see all

All Comments (159)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @johnnytheprick:

    "- and yet accretion theory is plausible/accepted? sheeeeeeeeesh!"

    Wait, so there is an accepted, proven theory like plate tectonics as an alternative to accretion theory and as much clear evidence proving that it is physically impossible like there is regarding expanding earth theory? Wow, I would like to learn abou that. No wait, let me guess: gawddidit!

  • @MsHyde1

    "The expanding earth theory is old and was dismissed because it is physically impossible." - and yet accretion theory is plausible/accepted? sheeeeeeeeesh!

    also, may i remind you that it was once thought the earth was the centre of the universe, and more recently, "nothing can travel faster than the speed of light".

    lets face it, youve been indoctrinated.

  • @johnnytheprick:

    "the reason why "we" havent found any evidence, is because "we" havent looked for it."

    The expanding earth theory is old and was dismissed because it is physically impossible. There is a theory that planets do expand but only to a small extend and not in relation with the idea that all the continets used to cover the earth completely. Which does in no way compromise plate tectonics which are supported by all the evidence while there is evidence against e.e.

  • @MsHyde1

    i doubt it. the internal heat wouldve prevented water from forming on terra ferma. the reason why "we" havent found any evidence, is because "we" havent looked for it.

    "I am also in awe of how that much pressure inside the earth only causes some vulcanos and earthquakes." - think water bottle being filled and ask: why does the bottle break here and not there? id love to see the maths on that one.

  • @johnnytheprick: So the whole earth was covered with water when it used to be so much smaller, right? I wonder why we don't find evidence for that.. XD I am also in awe of how that much pressure inside the earth only causes some vulcanos and earthquakes.

  • @venus1112:

    XD Oh yes, measurements all around the world are totally a conspiracy theory to piss you creationists off. Because in no way can the solstice sun shine through the holes in the cause of the day if the monument moved a hundred meters within 5000 years. Right. Bwahahaha!

  • None of this is true. There are no continents, because if there were and they were moving then the solstice sun and moon light and all the astronomical alignments would not shine in the holes and on the megalithic stones when and where they are supposed to around the world century after century. The dry land (earth) has in fact not moved one inch, not one. Not since the oldest pyramid or aligned to the stars stones were built.

  • hello

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more