Squash - Shabana vs Ashour - Stroke, Let or no Let?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
32,864
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 18, 2008

Finale Saudi Open, Shabana - Ashour Ramy

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @pussiofc Fishing means trying to turn a let into a stroke. You dont just give no let because he wants more than a let

  • id give no let. he was fishing there!

see all

All Comments (59)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @pussiofc would you have hit the ball?

  • @SuperSquashguy a fear of injury may still result in a No Let if the striker badly misjudged his opponents position - i.e. if the striker's fear of injuring the opponent was unreasonable.

  • The correct decision is Yes, Let. There was no interference at the time the striker could hit the ball. However, a let is allowed for reasonable fear of injury. To say that no let should be awarded (on the basis that a stroke was the hope of the striker) shows a lack of understanding of the rules.

  • @JackFowlerTube dip.. it was already no let he was mid swing and then asked for a let.. honestly for a pro thats a fuckin rookie move

  • no let. he swung and ball past him

  • Doing a freeze frame, it looks like a let. A shot to the cross court nick might have hit Ashour, which would be a stroke, which makes it seem close enough to be a let.

  • Let, fear of danger. Never should be a no let

  • mo let. ball passed him

  • david palmer's commentary was correct, let

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more