Squash - Shabana vs Ashour - Stroke, Let or no Let?
Top Comments
All Comments (59)
-
@pussiofc would you have hit the ball?
-
@SuperSquashguy a fear of injury may still result in a No Let if the striker badly misjudged his opponents position - i.e. if the striker's fear of injuring the opponent was unreasonable.
-
The correct decision is Yes, Let. There was no interference at the time the striker could hit the ball. However, a let is allowed for reasonable fear of injury. To say that no let should be awarded (on the basis that a stroke was the hope of the striker) shows a lack of understanding of the rules.
-
@JackFowlerTube dip.. it was already no let he was mid swing and then asked for a let.. honestly for a pro thats a fuckin rookie move
-
no let. he swung and ball past him
-
Doing a freeze frame, it looks like a let. A shot to the cross court nick might have hit Ashour, which would be a stroke, which makes it seem close enough to be a let.
-
Let, fear of danger. Never should be a no let
-
mo let. ball passed him
-
david palmer's commentary was correct, let
@pussiofc Fishing means trying to turn a let into a stroke. You dont just give no let because he wants more than a let
JackFowlerTube 1 year ago 4
id give no let. he was fishing there!
pussiofc 3 years ago 2