SA@TAC - Terrorism, Liberal and Conservative
Top Comments
All Comments (166)
-
Dude, you obviously haven't studied what you are writing about. Amelek and the Amelekites were rtying to destroy the Jews from the moment they left the valley of Sin. The people of that area were the child molesters, cannibals, rapists and sick fucks. That's why God had them destroyed. Nowhere in scripture does it ever say that God condones such things. He wanted them wiped out so that the chosen people could survive and future generations could live without such evil.
-
Let me play the role of the stupid republican here: TERRORISTS ARE INDIVIDUALS AGAINST AMERICA
-
Dropping the atomic bombs had two intended purposes, perhaps the lesser one being Japan, it was a warning to Stalin that you've advanced far enough,
-
wasn't Truman a Democrat? so conservatives support him? my how things have changed.
-
American Citizens don't have a government, Washington D.C. is an Organized Criminal Conspiracy!
-
My biggest pro-war conservative friend says that terrorism is only terrorism if it is "intended to instill fear". I find this outrageously stupid, and even when adhering to this definition he apparently believes dropping nuclear weapons on a nation does not constitute instilling fear. "oh, but these cities were industrial centers" he argued. Perhaps they were, but I still can't see any moral justification for so much death for the sake of ending the war.
-
God and the Jews are Terroists also: "Go and strike Amelek. Utterly destroy them. Kill all men, women, children, babies, and beasts." -God 1 Samuel 15:3.
God also supports slavery, rape, cannabalism, and child molestation.
-
@seethelightofgod What if the government named you and your family to be terrorists? Or arbitrarily named ppl of your religious faith, etc. etc. Get my point?
-
@oftheco sarcasm? Why talk about time dilation when you can use 1 + 1 to get a point across. People need to stop dogmatically defending their mascots of elephants and donkeys and use reason and logic to determine future actions; readily using the past as a grotesque animal, as a library, or zoo, to study outdated hopefully endangered vile ethics.
agharta788
You might want to think about that some more. It sounds like you're seeing the word "terrorism" and thinking it means the same thing as "violence". There is a difference between self defense (slave rebellion) and terrorism (kill all white people). Vesey wanted the latter. I highly doubt anybody here would object to the former, the SA included.
someguy3sg3 2 years ago 6
Does anyone still wonder why we fought the "civil war?"
TheFeralFury 1 year ago 4