Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

SA@TAC - Terrorism, Liberal and Conservative

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,620
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 15, 2010

Whether Denmark Vesey or Harry Truman--both Left and Right make ideological excuses for their favorite terrorists.

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • agharta788

    You might want to think about that some more. It sounds like you're seeing the word "terrorism" and thinking it means the same thing as "violence". There is a difference between self defense (slave rebellion) and terrorism (kill all white people). Vesey wanted the latter. I highly doubt anybody here would object to the former, the SA included.

  • Does anyone still wonder why we fought the "civil war?"

see all

All Comments (166)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @CelticAlphabet

    Dude, you obviously haven't studied what you are writing about. Amelek and the Amelekites were rtying to destroy the Jews from the moment they left the valley of Sin.  The people of that area were the child molesters, cannibals, rapists and sick fucks. That's why God had them destroyed. Nowhere in scripture does it ever say that God condones such things. He wanted them wiped out so that the chosen people could survive and future generations could live without such evil.

  • Let me play the role of the stupid republican here: TERRORISTS ARE INDIVIDUALS AGAINST AMERICA

  • Dropping the atomic bombs had two intended purposes, perhaps the lesser one being Japan, it was a warning to Stalin that you've advanced far enough,

  • wasn't Truman a Democrat? so conservatives support him? my how things have changed.

  • American Citizens don't have a government, Washington D.C. is an Organized Criminal Conspiracy!

  • My biggest pro-war conservative friend says that terrorism is only terrorism if it is "intended to instill fear". I find this outrageously stupid, and even when adhering to this definition he apparently believes dropping nuclear weapons on a nation does not constitute instilling fear. "oh, but these cities were industrial centers" he argued. Perhaps they were, but I still can't see any moral justification for so much death for the sake of ending the war.

  • God and the Jews are Terroists also: "Go and strike Amelek. Utterly destroy them. Kill all men, women, children, babies, and beasts." -God 1 Samuel 15:3.

    God also supports slavery, rape, cannabalism, and child molestation.

  • @seethelightofgod What if the government named you and your family to be terrorists? Or arbitrarily named ppl of your religious faith, etc. etc. Get my point?

  • @oftheco sarcasm? Why talk about time dilation when you can use 1 + 1 to get a point across. People need to stop dogmatically defending their mascots of elephants and donkeys and use reason and logic to determine future actions; readily using the past as a grotesque animal, as a library, or zoo, to study outdated hopefully endangered vile ethics.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more