Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

"Flock of Dodos" Trailer

Trailer for the feature documentary "Flock of Dodos: The Evolution-Intelligent Design Circus"  
 
Customize

More From: flockofdodosmovie

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

38 ratings
Sign in to rate
9,373 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (58)   Options

Loading...
Mortison77577 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Why didn't Randy Olson apologize for spreading false information about Haeck's embryos with this documentary? He could've been sued for that.
macronencer (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Just stopped by for a quick word. Here it is: "inertial". Byeeee!
neuralecho (6 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Don't try to make excuses. Dark Matter is more than just a label, it implies there is some sort of invisible and undetectable matter.

And you must be retarded not to know that mass is an intrinsic property of matter. And hence, when I used the word mass, I was actually referring to it's associated matter.
ozpowermo (6 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"Don't try to make excuses."
-- Oh no, I won't! LOL

"you can avoid admitting your claim that all mass in the universe is observed by it's gravitational effects is wrong."
-- And how exactly does one detect mass then? How do we measure/detect/observe mass? I definitely want to hear that one... go ahead! LOL HAHAH
neuralecho (6 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Science claims the existence of DM based on the observation of gravitational anomalies. So yes, science is claiming DM exists, for without it they have no way to explain the phenomena.

I know the difference between mass and matter. I was using the terms interchangeably because mass is an intrinsic property of matter.

You still didn't answer the question? How do you observe the matter of your car, and it's inherent mass? Not by it's gravitational effects I'll bet.
ozpowermo (6 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"I was using the terms interchangeably because mass is an intrinsic property of matter."
-- LOL HAHAHAHAHHAHA WOW! Seriously! WOW! HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
ozpowermo (6 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
"Just because you are ignorant and unwilling 2 evalutate the fulfilled prophecies doesn't mean they are fantasy."
-- You're the guy that can't tell the difference between matter and mass, yet you want to tell me about ignorance? Then you want to tell me about some prophecies? LOL HAHAHA
neuralecho (6 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
We were talking about mass which is an inherent property of matter. So nit pick all you like, you can avoid admitting your claim that all mass in the universe is observed by it's gravitational effects is wrong. You don't need to perform any gravitational experiiments to observe the matter/mass of the planet (or your car).

Attacking me for using the wrong term doesn't excuse your ignorance regarding fulfilled prophechy, and only serves to demonstrate that you would prefer to remain ignorant.
ozpowermo (6 months ago)
Comment removed by author
ozpowermo (6 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"Attacking me for using the wrong term..."
-- HAHAHAHHAHA, I'm going to die laughing here! Are you serious? I would have let it go if you just used the wrong term, but you keep claiming that they're interchangeable and you keep insisting that I'm wrong when everything we know about science tells us that the ONLY way to detect mass is through its gravitational effects... it's not just that you used the wrong term, it's your continual attempts to save face with more dumb stuff after it!

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.