Copying Is Not Theft -- remixed (jazz)

Jazzy remix of the Nina Paley song.

You can download the instrumental/karaoke version from here (10MB wav file) --

http://www.abelard-and-heloise.com/DownloadableMP3s/CopyingIsntTheftV103-inst...

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• Copyright
• Copyleft
• CC-BY-SA
• music
• jazz
• Nina
• Paley
• remix
• bunny
• bicycle
• freedom
• libre
• culture

[SergioOctubrePremium]

hey how i can have the instrumental for singning in spanish?

can you share with me the karaoke?

[szabo23]

@SergioOctubrePremium

Sure, no problem. I just added the link in the information box.

[LongcatFandubers]

thanks for the men instrumental, I'm going to take to make the song in Spanish latino and make all appropriate credits, really took a long time trying to interpret this theme ...... thank you very much for everything ... Greetings from Santiago de Chile

[crazydudetz]

This is kind of creepy

[ryancfcsas]

I suppose the copyright authorities are chasing those who record using Sky+ here in the UK or TIVO in the US? They're not? 

[RupeeClock]

@WattyTV Still, would it be affordable to produce bicycles that way?

To reproduce a physical copy of something takes manufacturing and material costs, copying data costs nothing.

My main concern really is the rubber of the tires, which give the flexibility and traction needed for good movement.

[WattyTV]

@RupeeClock I dunno... we're certainly at the stage a majority of a bicycle's components could be manufactured, at least at one of the professional 3-D printing companies. Itd only be a matter of time until the resolution is high enough and the costs are low enough for it to be feasible to create something like a bike, or at least all the components needed for one. It'll be interesting to see where copyright law goes when we get to that point.

[RupeeClock]

@WattyTV That's true, 3D printing can make usable replicas of actual things after scanning.

It's made a working wrench, but I doubt it could reproduce a bicycle.

[WattyTV]

People have been copying since long before the advent of the internet, cassette tape, or even the printing press. Each time it has been claimed the advent of new technology would destroy the living of creators, yet each time these claims have been unfounded. RIAA and MPAA are just taking their cases to the extreme.

I personally respect the wishes of copyright holders and buy their music, but also support more local and Creative Commons licensed music.

[WattyTV]

@RupeeClock We're getting very close with the increasing resolution of 3-D printing ;)

[AwkwardArmadillo]

This is kinda false, though you are not stealing directly, your still allowing someone to obtain ownership of a product that was for sale and not for free. Plus it shouldn't seem fair for to YOU if you had to buy it and they didn't. Losing potential buyers is technically stealing, your getting something for free that should have been purchased. There's no law against letting someone borrow something (for now) and that's a good alternative.

[AwookieGaming]

The corporations who condemn copying and just greedy pigs who want more money. If games like CoD were 30$ each to pay the artist, thats fair. But if its 60$ just to give more cash to the greedy publishing is unfair.