John Frame and Cornelius Van Til

Dr. Gordon H. Clark discusses the unorthodox and paradoxical theology of these two Neo-orthodox theologians.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Gordon
• H.
• Clark
• apologetics
• apologetic
• method
• logic
• reason
• Calvinism
• Calvinist
• Predestination
• sovereignty
• Presbyterian

[jyhoke]

Even if you do not agree with Van Til and Frame, it is gross error to label them as Neo-orthodox, I do not believe Dr. Clark would do that. Neo-orthodoxy is a liberal heresy that denies the authority of the scriptures. Both Van Til and Frame are reformed Presbyterian theologians just as Dr. Clark was, and while I like and have studied the works of all three men, I did not find this to be very helpful; because it is a class lecture ripped from its context and thus little light is shed.

[1noen1]

This is what happens when morons debate shit they haven't a clue about.

Just go out and play golf.

[Reformation1517]

I have enjoyed and learned much from every single book that I have read from Dr Gordon Haddon Clark. Clark's works deserve a wide reading among Christians.

Thank you brother for posting this lecture.

[numberonesurvivor75]

I agree with Clark completely on the issue of the Trinity.

[albybabeee]

Thanks for the video. This is excellent.

Clark is a great teacher.

[Goddoesexist]

God's existence is necessary and certain.

Deny God and one lacks the necessary a priori conditions for the universals and immutables of the Laws of Logic, the universal and immutable God supplies such; the laws of logic are necessary and certain, thus so is God.

God lives.

[koyhayleth]

Thanks for posting this wonderful piece of Christian History - it is a shame that the a wider audience does not recognise the value of this piece of audio- keep up the good work. one day people will see the value of this type of posting