Must be a new jobs program or Dems will pay

Tom Ferguson: The stimulus program was far too small, a much larger one is still needed

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• therealnews
• real
• news
• media
• politics
• US
• Dems
• jobs
• stimulus
• Tom Ferguson
• unemployment

[captcrais101]

We need to bring back manufacturing in America. We need more made in america and less made in china or other countries.

[MrLesWhite]

Correct me if I am wrong but insolvent means that not only are you broke but you are losing money or owe too much to continue operating

For gov to take tax money and put it into these people hands who are paying themselves and laying off the taxpayer seems like madness

This insanity will go down in the history books as the dumbest pyramid scheme in history

[Arkinight]

Arrogance? You mean like telling others what they are with absolute certainty?

"Arkinight and tarossi400 both of you are on extremes of a very valid arguement."

Really? We are? Why? Because you say so?

Ignorance? So we are ignorant, but Ryukikon has got it figured out. Well that certainly is not arrogant of you, because I'm sure you are that smart that you know what both of us meant, but only that you can't "be more detailed but it will then become a book", right?

Take a look in the mirror.

[Ryukikon]

I sincerely wish you the best in school and in life pursuits. By gaining in understanding you will by pass the eternal threat of ignorance and arrogance. Good luck

[mikesbodypolitic]

If i sound holier than though it's because im responding to the false legitimacy of arguments that use the US constitution as the basis of their thesis as though that meant something profound, like when people say "in Leviticus is says ..." "Jesus said ..." ect, it's a sort of nationalism that tries to sweep out of the way any possibility of people choosing something not original to the constitution through democracy. If i'm righteous, it's populist-righteous, not self-righteous.

[mikesbodypolitic]

My whole point, constitutionalists fail to appreciate that it is the ability to change a constitution and make it by popular choice that makes it legitimate. The US constitution was not made democratically, it was made by the elite representatives of the 13 colonies, who did not represent the poor the women the Indians or the slaves. It was a document written by elites for elites, prevented from being easily changed by antidemocratic requirements like the 2/3's clauses.

[Arkinight]

Attacked? No, you just aren't making much sense, either in your previous response or in this one. It's really difficult to make out what you're saying, sorry if that's hard to accept.

[Ryukikon]

lol, it was a direct response to the argument you and tarossi400 were having but then I guess your not even aware of what your writing at all. It will become clear when your stop looking through a narrow tube. Its okay that when you feel attacked you attack back, however this reaction will overtime work against you in live. Good luck.

[MooseOfReason]

mikesbodypolitic, It's a set of rules, and there is a method of changing those rules. It doesn't matter whether the founders were fallible.

I love your holier-than-thou outlook, though.

[mikesbodypolitic]

Yes, they worship a document to an irrational extent(The constitution) and ignore that that document was made by fallible men(deify them in order to make them infallible) and deify Ron Paul as a sort of messiah. The arguments have very little depth but spark anger if questioned, the followers of which litigiously stalk youtube testifying their perspective. It's very much like a religion, and similarly it's followers are people of faith and not logic, only the psuedo logic of religion.

[Arkinight]

That was an extremely convoluted explanation, I don't even see any point to what you said.