Anderson Cooper: Baseball more important than Africa
Uploader Comments (saulpaulus)
All Comments (8)
-
Metaphors are only effective if it is clear that they ARE metaphors. This was a bit of fluff. They spent a lot of time talking about immigration and n focusing on candidates who had NO chance of being nominated and, as a result, the serious candidates rarely had to answer the serious questions. I don't recall there being any questions about healthcare, global warming, North Korea, Iran, or Pakistan. But they made sure to throw in this bit of fluff.
-
its a metophor, he abandoned a losing team, whats going to stop him from changing positions on important issues after he's elected
-
Thanks for your lovely comment. I am familiar with Mr Cooper's reporting. I also know what questions he chose to use. If you think its acceptable for him to devote a question to baseball with all the problems there are in the world when he used no questions about global warming, healthcare, or development issues, then you and I have different value systems.
-
thw asshole who posted this needs to gets his facts straight. Anderson has dedicated much of his carrer to reporting on Africa...
jesus dude. they probably had 100s of questions, and purposely set aside one at the very end to be humorous, dont be mad because you arent as clever as you thought you were
nextbestrockstar 2 years ago
If this were Letterman, that "fluff" might be appropriate. On a program that was supposed to help us pick the 44th president of the US, to ignore climate change, healthcare, N Korea, Iran, and all but ignore China and include this question was beyond absurd.
saulpaulus 2 years ago
really? help us pick the 44th president? this was just a public appearance for the candidates, i really doubt any of them took this as seriously as an actual debate. and maybe they thought of asking them about etc later, in another debate. you really are mad they didnt pick your question, arent you?
nextbestrockstar 2 years ago
I was disappointed that they didn't use my question. I was mad that they wasted a question on nonsense like that when so many substantive issues were not even touched.
You are half right. They do not have real debates...I wish they would. But this represented a real chance for candidates to respond to voters' concerns. I hope they took it seriously. And I wish that the questions had more truly reflected the issues that will most affect our lives in the coming years.
saulpaulus 2 years ago
what if they had 50 questions, then just slapped this last one in, and it wasn't even a part of the 'debate' just added in to lighten the mood, and add some humor.
nextbestrockstar 2 years ago
You are setting up a strawman. As it was, the show took about two hours if memory serves. Do you really think they would even consider carrying that on for 4-5 hours?
But accepting your premise--even if there is NO possibility it would ever happen--yes, if they had seriously looked at all of the issues, I could live with them adding a bit of fluff.
saulpaulus 2 years ago