9/11 Revisited - Richard Gage, AIA Architect - Part 2
Top Comments
All Comments (64)
-
Folks that speak of damage to WTC7 being enough to cause its collapse have to understand the debri that struck the structure was on one side. Physics laws say that if a structure has compromised areas of weakness that structures abatement should be influenced in the direction of that weakness. Not an immediate vertical collapse as was witnessed. Folks abandon science and common sense surrounding 9/11. Pride refuses to allow them to accept their government lied or turned on them.
-
I agree, but any group that allows a thorough investigation will be plastered with ridicule. You will words like traitorious, insensitive (to the families that wish to move past this) and some may die. Understand what would be at stake with a re-opening of 9/11. America would be changed forever..the power infrastructure and media will lose all credibility. There would be anarchy. I think its necessary but some folks cant handle what may come so a lot choose to remain in denial
-
@MasterMark123 There should be one petition with a billion signatures and the public march on the streets in every city this September 11th 2011. to demand an investigation and trial of the suspects before they die of old age in the lap of luxury.
-
@MasterMark123 My point exactly, what power do we 'the people' truly have, and are we willing to use/do something about it?
-
At first this whole theory just seems like non-sence. Now the more I hear it the more it makes sence compared to the original story.
-
Yeah, the mass media was in on it....
-
where there people in that building?
-
@erentheca Really? You realize that all the other buildings in WTC plaza not hit by airplanes (3,4,5,6) were also completely destroyed. They were destroyed by megatons of falling debris. As was building 7. Research rear-view images/vids of blg 7. Many are obscured by smoke, but you should be able to see the damage inflicted on 7 by the derbis storm. In fact, it's surprising it stayed up as long as it did. The firemen did not have foreknowledge, they had seen the damage. That's how they knew.
-
Penthouse falling first is the telltale sign? Didn't the european demolitions "expert" say demolitions happend from the bottom?? Gage tries to come off as a academic, but cannot even pronounce "emeritus". This notion of "foreknowledge" has a lot of implications. We're saying the firemen knew there were demolitions? Blg 7 suffered extraordinary trauma from the collapsing towers. There are rear views of 7, though most are obscured by the massive amount of smoke, but you can still see the damage.
-
Now Mr Gage,explain how you could wire a building with explosives and keep everyone quiet about it for 9 years.How do you maintain molten steel for weeks in a debris pile? You like to point questions,try to answer a few.
He's talking about World Trade Center 7, which was NOT hit by a plane. WTC 1 and 2 were both hit by planes. WTC 7 was not. Try paying closer attention before you comment.
huffdaddy76 3 years ago 12
so we all know it was an inside job ... NOW what do we do about it ??
MasterMark123 4 years ago 11