NO INCOME TAX LAW FORMER "IRS" AGENT JOE BANNISTER PART 1

Joe Bannister explains in a interveiw the 2 year investigation he did, resulted in the IRS forcing him to resign.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• IRS
• ED
• AND
• ELAINE
• BROWN
• INCOME
• TAX
• ILLEGAL
• FEDRAL
• RESERVE
• INVESTIGATION
• ALEX
• JONES
• INFOWARS

[KevinMerck]

It’s a fact that the Constitution contains 4400 words and was meant to be *understood* by everyone.

It’s also a fact that the tax code contains 10,000,000 words and was intended to *steal* from everyone.

The 16th Amendment was never legally ratified, (see “The Law That Never Was”) and the income tax has been declared unconstitutional by the SCOTUS.

------------------------------­------------------------------­-

Stop paying the illegal income tax and join in the fight to expose 9/11.

[KevinMerck]

Taxfree 15/april strike

Stay at home, don't buy, don't comply.

Over 100,000,000 of your fellow Americans believe that the U.S. government was either directly or indirectly involved in the attacks of 9/11. Direct or indirect involvement is treason, punishable by death.

Demand a legitimate investigation as required by law.

[nate6474]

on the back of the w2 it says if you wont to get your refund you Should file your taxes "should" what if i dont not wont my refund try again sheep people one guy was a lawyer and he went to court and they said were does it say that we need to file are taxes and the irs boss said i have been paying taxes sence i was 16 so you should , so if he jumps off a bridge we should too thank about it sheep people wake up

[jac0441]

@sadegoGC There is no legal basis on why you HAVE to pay a tax on your earnings. You equally trade your labor for their wages. So where is a legal, or valid rather, reasoning in paying taxes on that? It's not an opinion guy, it's a very reasonable question. And the treasury is merely an entity that is empowered by the Fed to print money. The funds (income tax) they return to the Fed are not repaid to them. The federal government pays the treasury with money they borrowed from the Fed to b

[SadegoGG]

@TheGldnSldr

You are forgetting about many different aspects of the ratification process of an amendment to the US Constitution when making your analysis. Arguing the income tax is unconstitutional for any reason is completely frivolous and has absolutely no logical basis. Try answering these questions:

1) Who determines when the ratification requirements of an amendment has been met?

2) If there are disputes over this decision, who argues them?

[SadegoGG]

@royalblowno

The income tax has absolutely nothing to do with the federal reserve and its legal in every respect to the law. If you were to go to Court and argue the Federal Income Tax was unconstitutional and the IRS Code is not a law in the US, your arguments would be deemed frivolous, the opposing attorney would likely laugh at you, and you would most certainly lose the case regardless of how good your lawyer was.

[SadegoGG]

@jac0441

1. Opinion, no legal basis.

2. The money to pay the interest comes from the Federal Reserve. Then at the end of the fiscal year the money the US Treasury paid to the Federal Reserve as interest on the Federal Debt is rebated back to the US Treasury, after the Fed pays its operating costs. These operating costs would exist regardless of who set monetary policy and whether or not the Fed existed. Therefore, the Fed costs the US nothing in terms of interest.

[SadegoGG]

@KevinMerck

Actually, a majority of the IRS Code discusses cases in which people are not entitled to pay income taxes for various forms of income.

Anyways, the belief the income tax was not properly ratified is frivolous and you have absolutely no basis for such a claim. Making such a claim would bet suggest we should bring dead people back to life to argue over something they never disagreed on.

Do you even know who ratifies amendments and who deals with ratification issues?

[FreeBlago1]

I would pay a 700% STATE sales tax. Because its legal. States have the power, fed is a joke.

[TheGldnSldr]

@Tubeusercomm of course there are other baseless arguments that all point back to Benson and Beckmans "The Law That Never Was," a book based on partial research. I agree though on the subject of the Federal Reserve, that is a system designed to be corrupt.