Archaeology and The Bible 1 of 3
Uploader Comments (1rishShaman)
Top Comments
-
"As for early Christianity, it was far from being a community united in one belief and spread by love, as the Bible claims"
I am an atheist, but even I know the Bible doesn't claim that. The New Testament spends a lot of time on the disagreements between various apostles. One with Peter and Paul, it even calls it a confrontation. A quick wiki search gives others like arguing about whether Gentiles need circumcision, whether grace or law saves someone and which spiritual gift was the best.
-
This archaeologist _correctly_ presents the evidence against the Bible, having studied for 40 years the results of archeological investigations myself. For how archeaology has proved Noah's Flood is myth click on my username sapiensape.
All Comments (43)
-
Furthermore, the atheists claimed Pilate never existed either until they were proven wrong. Why should we listen to them now? Atheism is a religion but you probably can't admit that. I've never seen so many liars in one group, other than Muslims.
-
"King David existed, but he was only a two-bit chieftain, and the Exodus did not happen, and Joshua did not level the walls of Jericho."
No, you are a two-bit atheist. As I already stated, if the dupes claimed David never existed, they have no cred to say another word about him after it was proven he lived. That never stops morons from lying though, does it? The only two-bit people here are you and the frauds in the video.
Also, the liars of science claim that Yonaguni is a natural formation. Uh yeah OK pal. The problem for them is that it doesn't fit their narrative so they lie about it and dismiss what is OBVIOUSLY man-made. Poor pathetic little losers. Any fool who ever built a structure can see man made Yonaguni.
TheCrusaderWabbit 9 months ago
Really have some attitude issues when conversing with those of differing opinions, don't we?
Please feel free to reference links and such to certify your accusations in order to counter their statements. This is how debate and presenting arguments works, not talking shit to or using ad-homonyms against someone you disagree with.
"The liars of science" - This establishes that you either have issue with science and scientists or you get annoyed with contradictory views to your opinions?
1rishShaman 9 months ago 3
@1rishShaman
You insult a great King and want a measure of respect? Funny. You get what you give son. Answer my post about the Exodus or Yonaguni if you aren't a coward. You took time to post the slop in the video above but seem to run away from debate.
TheCrusaderWabbit 9 months ago
I do not know much about Yonaguni or even why you brought it up.
I ask you to present your evidence that counters the evidence presented in this video and to post a video response, you didn't provide any evidence, just your own opinion and slander against those whom disagree with your POV. I asked you to provide evidence (not your opinion) and you have yet to do so. I have nothing to "run away" from, rather, I await your replies with links or studies done on the Exodus authenticity.
1rishShaman 9 months ago 2
@TheCrusaderWabbit
What is with the hostility?
I uploaded the video because it had useful information. I wasn't a part in the information gathering, research and collaboration with the production so don't come bitching when you find something you disagree with.
If you have a video with that information you quoted in it, feel free to post it as a video response to the video if you so wish.
1rishShaman 9 months ago
Also, just because 1 piece of information is incorrect/disproved, that does not prove the other side of the argument to be truthful.
There is more evidence contradicting and questioning the biblical account of history, than agreeing and proving it as accurate history.
Peace
- Paul M.
1rishShaman 9 months ago