Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

What Is The Nature Of Coincidence?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
43,740
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 20, 2007

http://bit.ly/hd4Tsh - Perceiving Reality Question ##: What is the nature of coincidence and how should I interpret it?

  • likes, 22 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Although I'm not a kabbalist, I have to say this; whether or not you're uneasy has no real bearing - the definition of science is actually open to Kabbalah if you grab a dictionary and look up science. As long as it's a body of knowledge with facts that are systematically arranged, and gained through observation or experience then it's claims as science are just.

    Now, to confirm or refute it, you'd have to actually lower your gut defenses and approach it with the scientific spirit of discovery.

  • If truth was decided by how it makes people feel, or how uncomfortable they are made by the prospect of something, we'd still be living under an earth-centric model of the universe. You and I likely believe along the same lines, the only difference is I'm not invested in being right.

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (62)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I was led in this direction!Facinating!On ward with my Journey <3

  • SYNCHRONICITY MAAAAAAAN

  • I was watching all these ARIvideos and just afterwards a black spider appeared on my white rug. Googled it and it says "The Spider is an ancient symbol of mystery, power and growth."

  • @xthia25 not the point. Can you prove which are not right? And if you could, what would you base your results on?

  • @HarmonicImprint because nature is nothing if it has no awareness of itself - thus awareness is life.

  • @SynapseSnap Being uneasy or not is not the whole of the science. You are correct in saying you would have to approach it with the scientific spirit of discovery. My question to you is what other Sciences exist in figuring out how humans relate their creator? With science there is no investment of being right or wrong hence it nullifies the "ego" in the equation. So that being said "knowledge with facts that are systematically arranged, and gained through observation" would be considered laws.

  • * Vid excuse me

  • Oh dear. Got to 1:18, stopped the vod immediately. Conclusion, old hippy dude with dodgy concept. Back to the drawingboard then.

  • (PhysOrg.com) -- "One of the most controversial questions in cosmology is why the fundamental constants of nature seem fine-tuned for life. One of these fundamental constants is the fine-structure constant, or alpha, which is the coupling constant for the electromagnetic force and equal to about 1/137.0359. If alpha were just 4% bigger or smaller than it is, stars wouldn't be able to make carbon and oxygen, which would have made it impossible for life as we know it to exist."

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more