Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Federalism and You

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
18,465
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 4, 2006

A short film teaching of Federalism

  • likes, 8 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Aarowned)

  • Your Wikipedia answer to Dual Federalism is incorrect. Federalism is not 2 Branches. We have 3 branches of government at the national level. This concept is known as "Separation of Powers." Federalism is separate levels of government (national/state).

  • dual federalisim is the state and national goverment co-operating together

  • cool and interesting video! Do you have this topic in history at the moment?

  • i actually have it in my politics class, to know how federalisim has changed and the different stages of it you need to go into the history a little :)

  • AHAHAHAHA! I feel so much smarter now...thanks! :D

  • anytime!

see all

All Comments (42)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I don't recognize these accents and it's weird...good info though.

  • learning this has never been so fun

  • @conmixon Aarowned is correct. You're mixing up two separate concepts. Dual Federalism is the concept of the two governments (national and state) cooperating.

  • This reminds me of The One Ring to Rule Them All by Legendary Frog. Love it!

  • God, I love how this found it's way into my Senior American Government class.. Fuck ya America!

    Go Federalism, go!

  • @Aarowned actually dual federalism is defined as two or more branches of government in which each branch operates within its own sphere of power.

  • wow.. thanks for the history lesson.

  • Federalism begins with a Californicationalist Tea Pot Party Candidate

  • @agazahat On your comments maybe you should research just a little bit better, if you are trying to be truthful.

    Case in point: " Canada and Australia aren't governed by Kings so they're not constitutional monarchies,..."

    1) Webster Dict. "Monarchy": A system of gov'nt in which one person reigns, USUALLY a king or queen... ...The ruler, or monarch, is often only the head of state, not the head of gov'nt.

    2) CBCnews: "Canada is a constitutional monarchy"

    PLEASE read, learn and know the truth

  • @agazahat Canada and Australia are Const. Monarchies, a gov'nt were 1 person rules. The issue is your belief in the Const. as only one Doc, which is ridiculous. There's not enough space here to define the Const. is. Let's stick to the U.S. Const which is from "the people". The Preamble: (topic sentence) "We the People...", Art 1 Sec 2 House Reps chosen by the People, Bill of Rights: 1, 2, 4 the Right of the people, 9 retained by the people 10 powers...reserved...to the people, as well the 17.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more