Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Pilots for 9/11 Truth: Airplane controllability

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
10,080
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 21, 2010

excerpt from "9/11: World Trade Center Attack" by Pilots for 9/11 Truth - http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org -- see also http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSokEXdFjaQ -- pilot who flew actual aircraft used on 9/11 says it was impossible

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (400)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @BigOldScout My dad logged several million miles as an airline pilot, from the smallest 727s to the extended 747s. He says that once you're in the air the things are amazingly stable and easy to fly. He also says the 727 was his favorite because the new planes fly themselves so much - the are large and stable. The 727 was an overpowered sports car of a jet, and fun to fly. Not that that has much bearing on this conversation...

  • @Cre8tvMG I am a pilot and you are correct. If this guy is an Airline Pilot, I REFUSE TO FLY WITH HIM. Plus if 15 year old Charles J. Bishop could slam a building in Tampa, then as you said, Credibiliity lost.

  • A pilot who lands day after day on the center line of a runway says that it is impossible to hit a target wider than the plane itself? Credibility lost. Difficult yes. Requires training, yes. impossible, not even remotely!

    "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."

  • Guess work... nothing but guess work.... Pilots are NOT EXPERTS. Try Microsoft's airflight training and you WILL be an expert in manning that plane. RIDICULOUS!!

  • and who says he was licensed by FDNY? licensed to do what?

  • @vibeackermann

    well, let's review, he's not an engineer, he's not a demolition expert - he was employed as a photographer by controlled demolition, he claims he was an explosive loader - but that has not been confirmed -- as an explosive loader, he does not have direct access to explosives (he assists those that do) -- at most he is as qualifed as the receptionist at a hospital

    Someone qualified to say "it looks like" is not qualified to give an informed opinion

  • @Denierbud11 he rigged numerous buildings that were demolished and he has vast experience so one would assume in his proffesion he knows what he is talking about, if he didnt know what he was doing, first off he would not have been employed by controlled demolition INC second of all the FNDY would not license him to do his job............

  • @Denierbud11 how is he not a demolitions expert? you define a demolitions expert, he work for Controlled Demolition INC for 2.5 years, loading explosives so if he is not an expert then i dont know who is..................

  • So still waiting for a demolition expert from anywhere in the world who thinks the towers were controlled demolitions

    anyone?

  • @vibeackermann

    yeah, tom sulivan was a tech, he is not a demolitions expert -- what about him? he's not qualified to give expert opinion

    its like asking a janitor a medical opinion

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more